Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts made in March 1st, 2012

  • not everyone will climb to the top of mordor, and drop the ring into the fire. not everyone will pass through to the land of fairy in a magic mirror in an old manor’s parlor. not everyone will walk across the ice plateau of an alien world to safety on a quest of good political intentions gone awry. dueling massive polar-bear monsters on a desert world will also be rare in the life of most men, named John or not.

    but, we will all fall in love. everyone will. if you are not in love, you will be again in love soon. it is what happens among humans who are among humans. it is the way things are.

    fall in love today. fall in love with someone new, or someone you already love. find something new to celebrate with love. you have my permission.

    the books dedicated to these baser emotions are usually quite apparent from their cover. the cover speaks to the fantasy of being adored. hot chick with sword/tramp stamp/etc? this will be a power fantasy, taking control of her body and emotions. hot chick with pirate/cowboy/viking? this will be a powerlessness fantasy, where adoration happens on its own while he or she was busy living and doing and probably scheming. books that talk about these things tend to be set aside from other books and labeled and covered in pink, purple, and clear symbologies of romance, sexual attraction, and the appeal to baser emotions through advertising. in other forms of fiction, where these advertisements tend not to take place, the elements of the larger story that are fueled by these baser, older narratives of love and abandon, become a layer of complexity that humanizes and personalizes the narrative.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • http://citybookreview.com/2012/03/enormity/

    Read More...
  • I’ve a confession to make. I’ve a very conflicted relationship with romance. I’m a closet romantic, you see. I’m also a feminist raised in a misogynist environment which makes me extra twitchy. So, I’ll warn you now about the big, red, shiny, candy-like button that’s been accidentally mashed. (Already.) Dear Gentle Reader, do please turn down the volume on your inner ear. Chances are, this is going to come off 40% stronger than I actually mean. I’ll try to keep my gut reactions checked — no one likes being shouted at, and I do believe that other points of view are valid — so do try to keep all this information in mind. Danger, Will Robinson. There. You’ve been warned. :)

    I often wonder why there’s so much pressure on women to associate themselves with romance — both from males and from other females, strangely enough. Frankly, I find the idea that female = romance/sex to be sexist in the extreme. Placing a female character into a story does not instantly mean sex and/or romance any more that having two male characters in a scene means there’ll be gay sex.* That’s stupid, lazy thinking. Women do not solely exist for procreation nor for the titillation of straight men. Women do, in fact, concern ourselves with other things. Just like men supposedly do. I believe this prejudice stems from a certain aphorism my husband once told me. Men have a one track mind which is largely taken up by sex. Women have multi-tracks, the contents of which change. In fact, women can jump tracks at a rapid pace, and this is why men find women so bloody confusing. So, let me take out my elephant gun and shoot the whole concept that women = sex/romance in the face. With extreme prejudice. Right. Now. Oh, wait. Look. The f*cker has gotten up again. BLAM! BLAM! BLAM! Stay down! I mean it! [deep breath] Repeat after me, Dear Gentle Reader: female does not equate to romance or sex. Thank you for taking time to read this Public Service Announcement.

    (more…)

    Read More...