Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts made in January, 2013

  • Betsy here: I guess we’ve got no scheduled posts for this week so it’s free-for-all here at the Night Bazaar!! Woot! Next week we’ll emerge from the mayhem with a scheduled topic.

    Just got a new review for EXILE from examiner.com:

    Exile does an excellent job of fashioning a kingdom on the brink of implosion, as political, military, and personal factors place increasing pressure on the fragile peace that is already undermined by double agents and malignant magic. It also provides a unique conglomeration of magic, which is practiced mostly either by the enigmatic Moonlings or a race known as the Mance, who are in turns alluring and disturbing in their methods and manners.

    ~

    This post from Jim Hines speaks to our discussion on harassment at Cons. Publishing is a small world. People are watching. Behave yourselves.

    ~

    Along similar lines, lots of folks  are talking about this month’s SFWA Bulletin cover. I think it’s rockin’ cool art.

    Hell, she must be a good fighter. She killed that dude and look! not a scratch on her. And we’d know, wouldn’t we?

    What are your thoughts of a scantily clad, buxom swordswoman on the cover of our professional organization’s magazine? It’s okay to be torn, I guess. After all, SF/F has that tradition of scantily clad swordswomen.

    But then,  SF/F has that wee tradition of harassing scantily clad cosplayers at cons too. Does this kind of portrayal contribute to that culture?

    Read More...
  • It looks like we’ve got no topics this week, so I thought I’d do a giveaway! If you’d like a chance to win one of two hardcover copies of No Return, simply leave a comment below by Saturday, February 2nd!

    Note: If you’re outside the US or Canada and you’re drawn, you’ll get an e-copy and other fun email stuff instead of a hardcover. In that instance, I’ll redraw for another hardcover winner from the US or Canada.

    This is the full wraparound design!

    Synopsis:

    Staring into the night sky, an inhabitant of the planet Jeroun sees a glittering string of objects stretching before the moon. The Needle, in all actuality a collection of iron spheres large enough to affect the tides, is the god Adrash’s ultimatum to the people on the planet below:

    Prove yourselves worthy, or be destroyed.

    Vedas is a member of the Black Suits, an order of men and women who show their opposition to Adrash by staging battles in the streets. Having witnessed the death of a child in his care, knowing himself to be responsible, he sets off on a journey across Knoori, the planet’s one inhabitable continent. His destination: the decennial fighting tournament in Danoor.

    Traveling with him are Churls, a mercenary haunted by the ghost of her daughter, and Berun, a constructed man possessed by the soul of his creator. Both come to understand what Vedas’s victory in Danoor will mean: an all-out religious war. Battling their own inner demons, they are in no place to convince Vedas to turn back from his fate.

    Unbeknownst to these three travelers, the powerful outbound mages (astronauts who use alchemy to reach orbit) Ebn and Pol are engaging in actions that will call the god Adrash’s wrath down upon the world…

    Combining the mythic inventiveness of science fiction authors Roger Zelazny and Samuel R. Delany, the dark weirdness of China Mieville, and the epic scope of George R. R. Martin, No Return is my first novel. It takes place in the same universe as my Spectrum Award-shortlisted story, “The Succession of Knoorikios Khnum.”

    Words of Praise:

    “A visionary, violent, sexually charged, mystical novel – No Return challenges classification. Clearly, Zachary Jernigan has no respect for genre confines. His tale of gods hanging in the sky and a “constructed man” with glowing blue coals for his eyes and a motley band of fighters navigating a harsh landscape peopled by savage creatures and religious zealots… Well, it’s pure genius. Here’s hoping it’s just the first of many such works from this guy.” – David Anthony Durham, Campbell Award-winning author of the Acacia Trilogy

    “Zachary Jernigan’s genre-defying epic raises the bar for literary speculative fiction. It has the sweep of Frank Herbert’sDune and the intoxicatingly strange grandeur of Gene Wolfe’sBook of the New Sun, with a decadent, beautifully rendered vision all its own. One of the most impressive debuts of recent years.” – Elizabeth Hand, Nebula and World Fantasy Award-winning author of Available Dark and Radiant Days

    “Be careful picking this one up, because once you join with the adventurers in this strange and stunning debut novel, there will be no going back to familiar precincts of heroic fantasy. Zachary Jernigan starts at the very edge of the map and plunges deep into uncharted territory. Mages in space, do-it-yourself gods, merciless killers in love and a mechanical warrior with a heart of bronze await your reading pleasure. For thinking readers who like swashbuckling with an edge, NO RETURN delivers.” - James Patrick Kelly, winner of the Hugo, Nebula and Locus Awards

    No Return is a rich, diverse, inventive fantasy, in a style that reminds me in some ways of Tanith Lee’s Tales from the Flat Earth books. Zachary Jernigan has created a stunningly original world and I can’t wait to see where he takes it next.” – Martha Wells, author of The Books of the Raksura

    “Jernigan’s fiction is luminous and hallucinatory with its world-building, while still grounding readers into strong characters fully human. He scribes the future as an alien landscape with only just enough familiarity to unsettle us from our familiar, comfortable tropes. I highly recommend this gorgeous debut novel to all fans of strange fiction.” – J. M. McDermott, author of the Dogsland Trilogy

    Read More...
  • You Can’t Win! Or Can You?

    Last week’s topic was sexism. This week’s is racism. I have the grim feeling I’m not going to make it out of January without offending somebody. Still, onward!

    Specifically, as you would expect, I’m supposed to discuss racism and the genre of the fantastic. But most of the issues involved are issues for popular entertainment in general, and recent movies and TV shows have triggered controversies that illustrate them. So I’ll zigzag back and forth between our stuff and non-SF stuff as needed.

    For white-guy writers like me, race and ethnicity, even more than gender, can feel like a minefield. (Yeah, I know, poor, poor pitiful us. But bear with me.) By that, I mean that writing about characters of a different race can feel like a game we can’t win.

    Because we just can’t seem to please everybody. On one hand, some people tell us we shouldn’t even try to write about cultures to which we don’t belong, because we can’t possibly understand them well enough to depict them properly. But on the other, there are those who condemn us, if not as individuals at least in the aggregate, because our stories don’t contain enough diversity.

    In my opinion, the latter criticism is more valid than the former. Good writers possess the smarts and empathy to understand someone from a different culture. That’s part of what makes them good, and it’s especially true of fantasists, or it had better be. Because if a writer can’t even credibly depict his fellow human beings if they hail from, say, Tibet or Brazil, how likely is it that he can serve up a believable creature from another star system?

    And since we are capable of depicting people of other races and from other cultures, we should, when it makes sense to do so. It doesn’t always; “Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves” didn’t benefit from the inclusion of a black Merry Man. (It didn’t benefit from the inclusion of Kevin Costner, either.) But when it does make sense, our fiction gains in richness and power from incorporating more of the real world, and the inclusiveness conveys an implicit message about equality and brotherhood.

    Or hey, that’s the theory. In practice, creators can discover it’s not enough to depict characters of diverse races and cultures while avoiding stereotypes of the minstrel-show variety. Somebody can still slam the writers in question for the prejudice or insensitivity allegedly implicit in their work. Spike Lee’s recent denunciation of “Django Unchained” as a trivialization of the horrors of slavery is a case in point.

    It’s also criticism with which I disagree. “Django Unchained” is full of over-the-top gunslinger action and outright comedy. The bag mask scene is as funny as anything in “Blazing Saddles.” Yet the movie also depicts slavery as a monstrous evil, and Lee’s criticism begs the question of how much time, if any, has to pass before it’s permissible to use something inherently terrible as the springboard for an adventure story, humor, or anything other than the most somber and realistic depiction. Is “A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Forum” (ask your parents or grandparents) a despicable work because it makes light of slavery in ancient Rome? I think not, and if not, what’s the cutoff between it and “Django Unchained?”

    Clearly, any given work runs the risk of offending against good taste or being insensitive, and if it does, it’s fair to say so. But I disagree with Lee that any subject is inherently out of bounds for a certain storytelling approach. Done well, every genre can shed its own kind of light for its particular audience.

    Other critics don’t come right out and assert that writers had no business trying to tell their particular stories in the first place, but they aren’t shy about telling us they don’t care for the results. Rachel Shabi recently served up an example of this. Her article “And the Winner is…Islamophobia” is a commentary on “Argo” and “Homeland” (also on “Zero Dark Thirty,” but because I haven’t seen that yet, I can’t pick at what she has to say about it.) Her argument is that these works tacitly convey the notion that all Muslims are terrorists, in their hearts if not yet in action.

    I see where she’s coming from. But “Argo” is a single story, and its focus is the plight of the American diplomats in hiding and the effort to rescue them. It makes sense that the audience sees the Iranians through their eyes and the Iranians look scary. It’s good storytelling, and the suggestion that the movie should have spent time showing nice Iranians ignores the fact that no one tale can include everything. Writers must choose the elements that will create cohesive, compelling stories. That strategy, in and of itself, is not racist.

    I can’t make the same argument with quite the same fervor about “Homeland” because it’s a TV show. There is more room for nuance and balance (however one cares to define the latter.) Still, at this point (I’ve watched all the way to the end of Season Two), it doesn’t seem to me that the tight focus on American intelligence agents versus Middle Eastern terrorists is manifestly racist. That’s just what the story is about. Now, one could argue that the series constitutes a tactic endorsement of US policy (and Shabi did that, too), but even if it does, that’s not the same thing as racism.

    Turning to criticism of work in our own genre (I knew I’d get back eventually), if a writer is lucky (relatively speaking), a commentator may view his work with general approval yet still call him out for a certain element within it. As Nnedi Okorafor-Mbachu called out Stephen King for using “the Magical Negro” in several of his novels. As defined by Spike Lee (I don’t know if he was the first to do so), the Magical Negro is a black character possessed of wondrous abilities whose sole apparent purpose is to assist a white protagonist even when that requires great self-sacrifice. Such characters arguably embody a racist fantasy of black subservience within the superficial appearance of empowerment.

    I see some justice in that criticism, and certainly, even a stereotype that embodies some positive qualities can be dehumanizing. But in King’s defense, Dick Halloran, Mother Abigail, John Coffey, and his other Magical Negroes don’t come across as merely the same stereotype wearing different clothes but rather as individuals. And as a white-guy writer, I wonder where the exposure of this particular plot device leaves me. Should I resolve that in my fiction, no black character will ever be a mentor to a white one or altruistically risk danger or wield magic on a white character’s behalf? Aside from cramping my style, might that not be a kind of racism, too?

    One criticism unique to our genre is that a particular fantasy character or imaginary race is a stand-in for a real one. Some people have charged that Jar Jar Binks is a caricature of a Rastafarian, while others have suggested that Tolkien’s orcs are his veiled depiction of people of color.

    If any writers have in fact used fantasy characters to encode racism in their work, well, shame on them. But I think such charges are difficult to prove, and that those who make them may underestimate the complexity and, often, the sheer murkiness of the creative process. In other words, people shouldn’t leap to hasty conclusions about what writers have done and why. Much of the time, we don’t know ourselves.

    Perhaps that’s part of the point of this somewhat rambling discussion, a plea for a little slack. Last week, I pointed out that one unflattering portrayal of a particular female character or depiction of a woman being abused doesn’t make the writer a sexist. The same principle applies to racism. The world’s a complicated place, every group is capable of both good and bad, and if a particular story looks at a negative aspect of a particular culture, that’s not the same thing as spitting at the culture or its members. (Unless the “negative aspect” is simply a racial slur.)

    On the other hand, though, and really, more importantly, writers would be wise not to self-censor but to reflect on their work once in a while and consider what it conveys with regard to race. Because racial issues can be subtle, we should also be willing to listen when someone tells us something in our fiction is problematic. We needn’t agree, but we should hear the critic out.

    If we do, perhaps our stories can occasionally enlighten as well as entertain. Failing that, we may at least avoid reinforcing anybody’s prejudice.

    Read More...
  • This was my writing prompt:

    It’s a new year. How soon before racefail2013 happens? Let’s get the ball rolling now. What is the current state of people of color in the sf/f/horror genres? Who are your favorite writers of color? Who are your favorite characters of color? What are some of your favorite non-Western European settings?

    #

    This photo reflects the fact that I'm running out of flattering images of myself. It is NOT, I must insist, an attempt to showcase my open-mindedness by featuring myself in front of a plate of Eritrean food. At least, I hope it isn't.

    I… well, shit, I don’t know what I think of that. I consider these worthwhile questions, really; it’s just that I’m becoming ever less convinced that what the discussion needs is more white writers talking about it. Beyond stating that the genre here in the anglophone world could be — and would benefit from being — m0re diverse, I don’t know what I can say that will really shed light on a problem that’s so obvious. (Why do I say it’s obvious? Well, for one, we’ve got a week’s worth of white writers commenting on race here at The Night Bazaar. This is not an indictment of Night Shade, of course, as they routinely try to gather more diverse voices. Nonetheless, it does say something.)

    So, instead of trying to be some kind of advocate for writers of color, characters of color, and non-Western cultures, I’ll just tell you why a person like me comes to the conclusion that he’s not meant to speak his mind on any given topic concerning people of color and non-western perspectives. It might not do much to make the field of sffh literature any more welcoming (it hardly would have done that, anyway), but it might inspire other white writers and readers to shut up and listen a little more to those who continue to receive the shitty end of the stick from the privileged white class.

    (If the term “privileged white class” bothers you, fuck off now. And if your immediate reaction is to say, “But white people got it bad, too! We’re a minority now!” then you can fall on a sword.)

    I used to think, and assert vocally — not all that long ago, I might add; as little as two years ago — that it was a virtue to speak for people of color, to highlight the injustices done to them, to try to write from the perspectives of people of other cultures — in an effort, basically, to wrap my mind around what it meant to be someone else, in an underprivileged situation. I thought of it as a highly compassionate act, this donning of another person’s skin through writing.

    “How else,” I’d ask, “will you learn to understand other people?”

    I, like a lot of relatively young white male writers who wake up with an injustice-boner, spent a lot of time trying to find the voice of people in other cultures — in truth, not so that I could increase my compassion but because I wanted to show that I could. I wanted to be viewed as a person who cared about the global community. I didn’t want to be looked at as one of those authors who blithely accepted the state of the world and wrote about it without awareness. I…

    I. I. I. God it hurts, there was so much I.

    To be perfectly honest, there’s still a lot of I, but I’ve at least begun to doubt (thanks to many discussions with writers of color, and women, and in general people more humble and intelligent and compassionate than me; also, bloggers such as this person) that asserting my voice on all issues is the best thing for a guy like me to do. Such an approach is kind of like saying, “Because of a vast system of oppression resulting in massive inequality, I have a LOUDER VOICE than any twenty brown people. Everybody everywhere’s already kind of forced to listen to people like me, soooooo… Maybe me talking more is the solution to such inequality!”

    Makes no goddamn sense, does it?

    I’ll go ahead and answer for you: No. No it doesn’t. Not a lick.

    Still, even knowing this, understanding it intellectually, I struggle to shut my mouth and just listen to the voices of others far more suited to discussing the issue of diversity. I struggle not to jump in and defend myself and assert that I’m not one of the bad people. I struggle to admit the reality, which is that there is a continual racefail event occurring, and it is guys like me opening their overfed mouths to speak on the subject of race.

    Now, please understand, I’m not a “race traitor” or a “self-hating caucasian” or any such ridiculous thing. (And I shouldn’t have to qualify this, but: my words most explicitly do not espouse any kind of belief that white folks are irredeemable, that we suffer from some kind of inherent negative trait. No, this is all junk inherited by way of privilege, and the blindness that comes from privilege.) I love my heritage. I love my skin color. I believe that my culture — white American and Western European culture; varied in expression as it is — has contributed positive things to the world.

    I’m not interested in discussing such things, however; even the most valid of them have been discussed ad nauseum, and used as justifications for far too long. What I am interested in, instead, is moving away from a louder cry of empathy and toward silent proof of out HAVING LEARNED AN IMPORTANT LESSON: We are not meant to speak our minds, always. We’ve, just like everyone else, got two ears and one mouth, so it’s about time we stop stealing other people’s mouths so that we might shout more at greater volume.

    #

    None of this is to say that we, privileged white authors, cannot achieve a state of communion with others, that we cannot learn and feel a measure of just solidarity, or that we shouldn’t, heaven forbid, write about it now and then.

    But. But, but, but… I think we need to stop arrogantly assuming that because it’s there to write about, and because it’s a free fucking country, that we’re qualified to write about anything there is to write about and which our freedom entitles us to express ourselves concerning. Since colonial times, we white folks — and especially white Americans — have never been good at moderating ourselves, at restricting our expression, but I posit that it’s probably high time we do so. For art’s sake, and our collective character’s sake.

    Proceed cautiously, basically. I mean, good grief, especially if you are attempting to write about another culture, ask questions of those people in that culture. It maddens me that anyone is so stupid as to make this basic mistake, yet I know I have. It’s humbling work to bridge the gaps between white, American me and pigmented, un-American you. So much easier to just assume, to simply fake it, to write yet another work that fails for everyone in the culture you’re writing about.

    But hey, you’re selling a book to more white people (an assumption backed by decades of language that supports the concept of a ground state — a “default setting” of whiteness), so what does it matter?

    Remember: For art’s sake. For our collective character’s sake. Write fucking better. Hold back on speaking for someone else. Ask someone who would know, “Did I get this right?” and “Should I even be attempting this?”

    #

    Progress is slow, for me. I’m a late bloomer, or an arrested adolescent, or whatever you want to label it; the point is that it’s taken me a long damn time to realize how many things I’m not even close to being an expert on, the least of which are other human beings. I think I get the general stuff: This hurts. This feels good. This is probably immoral. Etc.

    But the things that appear smaller — skin color, culture, gender and sex? The fact that these factors are just as important to defining a person alluded me for a long, long time. Perhaps it’s the overall feeling of “culturelessness” that many white Americans feel that contributed to it; I don’t know. All I know is that I’m grateful — grateful to have been exposed to people who were kind and patient (or angry, or confused, or for whatever reason in love) enough with me to keep bugging me to open my eyes. I’m grateful also that, by the time I started publishing fiction, some of these lessons had sunk in. I’ve still made some dumb mistakes, painfully recently, and probably I’ll continue making mistakes. But at least…

    Ah. Always with the self-justification (see last week’s post for a quick update). Always with the I, I, I.

    Fact is — and yes, I’m aware of the continuation of all the “I statements” and I’m simply, unfortunately, unwilling to stop them just yet — my first novel could be one giant bucket of racefail. I’d like to think that because the world I write in is entirely make-believe, with no Africa (or Asia or Australia or any of the other dozen continents on Earth; no, I’m not good at geography), I didn’t write any racialized bullshit into Vedas, one of my main characters, a man with black skin and Afro-textured hair.

    But I can’t be so charitable to myself, in part because I was around for the editing process, wherein two embarrassing things got taken out of my book:

    1.) I described Vedas’s hands as being “large enough to palm a watermelon.” Ross, my awesome editor, caught this one. One just doesn’t describe a black man as having hands large enough to palm a watermelon, he wrote in the manuscript’s margins, for which I was grateful and suitably horrified.

    2.) I described Vedas’s people as “tall, broad-shouldered, casually athletic.” I caught this one myself.

    I’m very glad those descriptions are out of the story. Still, I can’t be so naive as to think that two instances of fail are the only ones in there. There must be embarrassing things I missed.

    I live in fear of having those things pointed out to me.

    At the same time, the possibility causes me an odd feeling of excitement. I almost welcome someone noticing where I’ve come up short, where I’ve made an ass of myself.

    Why? Because making an ass of myself is another reminder that I’ve got so much more listening left to do.

    #

    #

    Cover art by Robbie Trevino. Design by Claudia Noble.

    Zachary Jernigan is an author who lives in the state of Arizona, where the weather is nice and the political decisions are horrifying. His first novel, No Return (Amazon link), is already available to those who use Netgalley for review purposes. It’ll be out properly on March 5th of this year.

    The cover design was recently finalized, and you can see it there on the left. Isn’t it brilliant!

    Read More...
  • I remember in the long PR buildup to The Empire Strikes Back, various characters from the movie began making live public appearances around my hometown of LA.  These were not the actual cast members, only faceless characters:  R2D2, C3P0, random lonely Stormtroopers, even the mysterious Boba Fett crashed various media events to gin up some early buzz.

    One such event was a Q&A session with Darth Vader.

    Whoa.  A chance to meet Darth Vader.  Maybe not the real Darth Vader, but a reasonable facsimile of the Darth Vader costume!

    People waited in long lines for this priceless opportunity, and I was one of them.  I never got a turn to ask a question, but that was okay since I already knew everything there was to know about Darth Vader.  Most of the questions were pretty boring (“Why do you wear that helmet?”) but a couple of them were interestingly awkward—so much so that I still remember them over thirty years later.  At the time they made me uncomfortable and even annoyed.  How dare you disrespect Star Wars!

    I recall one woman saying, “I’ve heard disturbing rumors that Luke gets his hand cut off in this movie.  Since I’m sure you wouldn’t do anything to upset your younger fans, can you please help us reassure our children that nothing that scary is going to happen?”

    To which the quick-thinking pseudo-Vader replied, “I do not know what this thing you call a ‘movie’ is, but even the power of the Dark Side does not reveal everything that is to come.  Next question!”

    A few softballs later, a man used his turn at the mike to blurt out, “How come there are no blacks in Star Wars?”

    Faux-Vader didn’t miss a beat:  “Obviously I am black.”

    This drew a laugh from the audience, but I could tell the man was less than amused, shaking his head disgustedly as he returned to his seat. He was a white guy, so I wasn’t sure what he had to complain about.  Siddown, loser!

    The question seemed especially clueless to me because I knew that in a sense Vader really was black, since in the movie he was voiced by James Earl Jones (though his body was that of white actor David Prowse).  Obviously Lucasfilm was sensitive to charges of racism, because The Empire Strikes Back was about to introduce a black supporting character, Lando Calrissian (Billy Dee Williams), which if I’d known would have made me even more smug.

    But over the years I became more conscious of the whiteness of most SF/F.  This is hardly surprising, since most entertainment of any kind was generally by and for white audiences.  That didn’t mean it was necessarily racist, just limited.  Since SF/F is by definition supposed to be unlimited, the race issue is harder to ignore.

    From the Sixties (Star Trek) right on up to the present day (The Avengers), the approved way to compensate for this monotony has been by casting an ethnic person in a supporting role, but that only highlights the shameful lack of culturally-diverse stories.  The Spielbergian concept of white suburbia as the center of the Universe was always a little offensive to me, and I’m not even black.

    Not all of this is the fault of creators; I’m sure commercial considerations are at the heart of it.  I’ve read that George Lucas originally considered making Star Wars with an all-black cast, and I have no doubt that if such a thing was Hollywood’s idea of a financial slam dunk, then that’s the movie he would have made.

    But wouldn’t it defeat the whole purpose to have such a movie written and directed by a white guy?  Personally, I would like nothing better than to see an epic space fantasy made by Spike Lee or some other serious filmmaker of color.  For that matter I would love to think there are brilliant Third World immigrants who grew up on Star Wars and love SF/F as much as I do, who now want to bring their own myths and legends to the party.  The problem is selling such exotic visions on Main Street.

    It will happen.  The world is getting smaller all the time.

    In the meantime, those of us in the field can only do our best to write stories that reflect the complex realities of the world, and don’t just fall back on easy stereotypes.  That doesn’t mean we have to pretend to be black, just that we should challenge our own assumptions a little, try to be more interesting.

    Interesting is always good.

    Thanks for reading!

    Read More...
  • This week we’re writing about Racefail 2013 and I have plenty to say about it from my own experience, so I’m going to leave commenting on multi-racial characters and worlds in the rest of recent Fantasy and Science Fiction to my better-informed colleagues.

    This is as good a place as any to just come out and say it: I never really thought of Draken as black when I wrote him. So when I saw John Stanko’s conception of him I said to myself, “Well, would you look at that. Draken is black.”

    When I write, I don’t see scenes play like a movie in my head, nor do I pick out  famous actors who fit my character’s look. I’m a firm believer that imagining how they look, beyond what is needed to serve the story, is best left to the reader. So I really didn’t think much about his looks, black, white, or whatever. Nice ideal, huh? It’s like I live in writer Utopia or something.

    Okay, confession time: if you hadn’t guessed by now, the thing about me being surprised that Draken is black is a wee lie. Jeremy Lassen and John consulted me on his appearance. Plus, yeah, I knew Draken has dark skin and locked braids. It says so right in the book. I was so relieved they talked to me about the cover because I have had to email a cover artist in the past with the gentle comment: “She’s not blonde and blue-eyed and quite so, um … pale.”  In that case the artist simply removed all people from the cover, which was cool, since I wasn’t into people kissing in the sky above the desolate landscape setting of my space opera anyway.

    SoI was all: Yay! Draken looks like Draken! And it was all cool…until I got this shrill fear that readers might think  I meant Something by his skin color or his dreadlocks or that the book was some sort of lo-brow Pontification On Prejudice or a Statement on the abundance of white characters peopling Euro-worlds in fantasy… Whoa! Back up the truck!

    Not that my fear is entirely unfounded. Writers have been eviscerated over race in their stories. And here I am, a short white woman writing a big, dark-skinned, bad-ass man. The question is bound to come up at some point…Why is he black? (To which I would like to snottily answer, “Why is he big? Why is he a man? Why does he have blue eyes? Why is he bowman rather than a swordsman?”)

    Except I realized I didn’t know. I had to ask myself why. I went back to the beginning and examined my development of Draken, which had nothing to do with skin color and everything to do with character.

    Draken is mixed-race because he doesn’t belong anywhere. He is always torn between his new country and his old one, between the different cultures in Akrasia, between cruelty and kindness, between what he knows and what he’s learning, even between the gods and mankind. Draken doesn’t have the luxury of indulging in prejudice. He is always teetering on the cliff between survival and death and his only rope is woven of lies. He doesn’t have the option of turning down help from anyone, even from people he really doesn’t much like or trust. He’s no Bilbo Baggins, who eventually gets to return home to the Shire. Draken has no true home and never will. So with all that, I needed a device, something simple and poignant that would keep him from ever belonging anywhere. His mixed heritage in a bigoted world became that device.

    Okay. Good enough. No statement on society intended. Move along. Nothing to see here.

    Except, a friend happened to mention to me that I write quite a few characters of color. (I’m seriously cringing. Of color? What is the proper PC term? Oh right, PC is so 2010…it’s tough to keep up.) But she was right. And once again I had to ask myself why. And again, I went back to the beginning of character-development, only not Draken’s this time but mine.

    The first boy I ever had a crush on was beautiful, black curls and coffee-hued skin and brown eyes deep and dark enough to melt a first-grader’s soul. And when I showed my class picture to my Granddaddy (God rest his soul) he asked me, “What? You like that n*****?”

    The boy abruptly and very distinctly did not look so beautiful to me anymore.

    That has always stuck with me, how we are not actually colorblind as children, but color-aware. That boy’s skin color, his curls, his physical difference from me, was the source of his beauty – until someone told me different.

    When I showed my new cover to my teenaged son and his friends, they said not a word about Draken’s skin tone. They said he was bad-ass and they especially liked the knife and why is that brand on his hand… which means, hopefully I’ve done fairly well at insulating my kids from prejudice because it is most definitely learned and sure as hell won’t be taught them by me.

    Right then. Moving on. Whew. No earth-shattering Statement here.

    Except, I grew up in Kansas City and Chicago and went to Kansas University—a big college with all sorts of people. I was one of two white people in my office in my first real job out of college. I taught in court-ordered desegregated school districts in Kansas. I had lots of friends, acquaintances, and students of all races, creeds, opinions, education levels, and lifestyles. Where I live now? Not so much. (coughcoughStepfordcough)

    I miss them—not people of color, but people of differences.

    In stories, unfortunately, race and color and prejudice are still simple character devices most people can readily identify with. So hell, maybe my bi-racial character is a Statement. And if it is, what am I saying when I created a world where prejudice thrives, where various races show open disdain for each other, where mixed-race people are considered heresy against the very gods? What does it say about me as a writer? I guess it says I’m writing what I know, and I’m writing what disappoints me most about our real world: our persistent, destructive habit of loathing the differences between us.

    Read More...
  • Sexism, our community, and our genre

    This week, we denizens of the Night Bazaar are invited to consider sexism in the science fiction/fantasy/horror/comics/whatever community and the genre of the fantastic itself. It’s further suggested we contemplate sexual harassment at conventions, the suggestion that provocatively clad female cosplayers aren’t true geeks, and the sexist content or lack of same in our own work and that of others.

    I find this task daunting because I don’t know how to cleverly discuss the three subtopics in relation to one another to demonstrate a single underlying truth. I can kick each of them around a little, but if the following lacks the unity a good essay should have, I ask your indulgence.

    I haven’t witnessed sexual harassment at a con in a while, but I don’t doubt it still occurs. In my opinion (and this may shock you), it’s bad.

    In fact, it’s bad enough that no convention committee worth a damn will allow it to continue if they know it’s going on. (If they do, they need to be replaced, or we need not to patronize the event they run anymore.) Thus, I encourage anyone who’s the target of harassment to report the situation to convention registration or security. Don’t let some asshole ruin your good time.

    But I don’t mean to put the whole burden of stopping harassment on convention staff. Any attendee who witnesses harassment can intervene, although I recommend tact and the support of likeminded souls over any approach you may have seen in a Jason Statham movie.

    As I hope you gleaned from the above, I take the issue of sexual harassment seriously. That sets it apart from the cosplay controversy, which is stupid.

    In last week’s post, I referenced John Scalzi’s comment that a geek is anyone who chooses to define him- or herself that way. If we accept this premise (and it strikes me as pure snobbery not to), then the idea that a female cosplayer or anybody else knocking around fandom is a fake geek becomes nonsensical.

    But actually, there’s more (albeit, nothing that’s more sensible) to this particular issue.

    Besides doubting whether the women in question are genuine 100% honest-to-Gernsback geeks, their detractors decry the fact that they wear tight or skimpy outfits, and as a result, male fans look at them with appreciative eyes. Presumably, this is deemed deplorable because someone is supposedly being exploited or hurt. Why else would anybody care?

    But I don’t see the exploitation or harm. To me, this just looks like a fannish instance of normal human behavior. A con is a big party for our clan, women commonly try to look attractive at parties, and guys enjoy the view.

    Is that horrible? Surely, only if sexuality itself is dangerous and/or disgusting. In my judgment (and again, this may shock you), it isn’t.

    Well, then, does the behavior somehow become horrible when geeks are involved? Only if our community is made up of psychological defectives at risk of flipping out over something the rest of society takes in stride. And it’s not. There’s a smidgen of truth in the stereotype of the socially awkward geek, but relatively few of us make the sexual predator watch list or jump out of high windows upon glimpsing cleavage.

    But even though we don’t, perhaps it’s still worth taking a critical look at the genre of the fantastic as novelists, filmmakers, comic book creators, etc., work in it today. Is there content that might influence the audience to view sexual harassment as acceptable or to go nuts when cosplayers dress up as Lieutenant Uhura or Vampirella?

    I don’t see sexism in my own stuff, but I realize I could conceivably be blind to that which is painfully apparent to others. I have female readers, though, and those who share their reactions with me aren’t complaining. That gives me hope that I’m doing something right.

    It’s hard for me to comment on the field as a whole because, as I mentioned in a previous post, I simply don’t get to read or watch more than a tiny fraction of what’s out there. But in what I do see, strong female characters are the norm. Passive, helpless women appear rarely, at least in central roles.

    That said, weak women aren’t the only sort of sexist female character a writer could create, and in horror, I often still encounter the succubus, whose evil sexuality destroys men. Come to think of it, I myself wrote a version of her in Blind God’s Bluff. But horror’s a good place for her. Men and women don’t understand each other perfectly, that misunderstanding can create a little anxiety and mistrust in even the best of us, and the purpose of horror (well, one of its purposes) is to stick our fears, major and minor, rational and otherwise, on a stage and take a look at them.

    In any case, in horror or any other genre, we do well to be wary of concluding that the writer who creates the occasional weak or evil female character, or who depicts the occasional act of brutality against women, is a sexist swine propping up all that’s vile and atavistic in our culture. Because there actually are weak and evil women in real life just as there are strong and virtuous ones, and women do sometimes fall victim to brutality. Writers need the freedom to depict such people and situations, or their work will be less than it could be. (Which is not to suggest that a creator’s entire body of work might not convey a pervasive attitude. I’m not trying to get John Norman off the hook.)

    It does seem to me that both the culture of the US and our subculture of fandom are gradually changing for the better. Eventually, we might even reach a point where women simply don’t get harassed, nobody freaks out over skintight costumes, and no one finds it necessary to check our entertainments for sexual political correctness. That would be nice.

    Read More...
  • Rumors have a way of spreading at conventions, and so the first time I heard that some guy was being abusive toward women at the 2011 World Fantasy Convention, I didn’t pay much attention, figuring it had already been addressed. The second, third and fourth times? I started paying attention.

    By the second day, he had gone from nuisance to threat, and women were hiding in their hotel rooms to avoid him. A friend, knowing my experience in working security and helping resolve harassment issues, asked me to take it up with the WFC Board.

    By Saturday night, the behavior had escalated from threats to ‘accidental’ touching of breasts, attempts to force a kiss, and more. Eventually, I had to call hotel security to get rid of him…and then watch people defend his actions.

    But I’ve already written those reports many times, and there’s no sense in getting bogged down on it now. You can find the link here, if you want to read more.

    This isn’t about one incident, or one guy, or one convention, or one bitch with a bee in her bonnet. It’s about the #1reasonwhy tag on Twitter, talking about sexism in the game industry. That topic would go on to be written up in leading genre sites and national magazines. It’s about the ReaderCon incident, the rape ‘jokes’ on online articles, the claims that ‘nothing’s wrong with us’.

    It’s about how frequently this happens, how little recourse there is, and how damaging it is to the industry at large. It isn’t a problem for a subset of women, or women in one particular industry. It isn’t just about rape or inappropriate touching, this isn’t just some ‘bitch with a bee in her bonnet’ (as one abuser called me).

    It’s about respect, safety, dignity, honesty and pride. It’s a problem for the men, too, because most of them are not rapists or abusers, but they end up being treated with the same caution because there’s no sticker that says ‘danger danger’. It’s a problem for conventions, because it means women are less likely to attend, and men who understand the issue are less likely to attend, and then things just keep going downhill from there.

    But here’s the thing. I’m tired of talking about it. I realized, as I was writing this article, that everything I want to say has already been said in so many ways, at so many places. We’ve raised our voices. We’ve brought attention to it. What more is there to say? We need to stop just talking and start doing something about it.

    An excellent example of this is the Readercon fiasco. A woman was harassed, the ball was dropped, other people came forward, the community demanded a response. The board was replaced, and things simmered down. We all felt very proud of ourselves.

    And then we got reports that he was at WorldCon, helping out behind the stage, and continuing to make women uncomfortable.

    Now, the outcry was the initial key that got this going. We did make good progress, yes. Things were briefly better. But the problem is, it is more damaging when one goes into what should be a safe environment, and isn’t, than when one goes into an environment that is known to be unsafe. It is traumatic to have that safety compromised. It’s like getting into your house and finding a burglar waiting for you. That’s your sanctity, your safe place.

    How many women did we lose from the conventions in question, because of that? How many men? How many people?.

    It is about not just paving the way for the future in terms of new technology and cool products, but in basic human decency, too. Science made amazing breakthroughs last year, but we’re still caught up in trying to figure out if women have the right to feel safe in a social circle. SF needs to decide if it’s a clubhouse or an industry, because it can’t be both ways.

    Fixing this isn’t going to be easy, and it sure won’t be fun. We’re going to have to stir up the bees’ nest, and we will get stung. We’ll lose friends, and people will be hurt, but it has to happen.

    And until it does, we have no right calling ourselves the ‘genre of the future’.

    Jaym Gates is the publicist for Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America, Pathfinder Tales and more.

    Her work includes anthologies Rigor Amortis and Broken Time Blues, short stories in Aether Age and M-Brane SF magazine, nonfiction in Fantasy Magazine and Crossed Genres, and blog appearances at Science In My Fiction, Apex Book Company, Booklife Now, and the SFWA blog.

    She can be found on Twitter (@JaymGates), and information about hiring her can be found at jaymgates.com (forgive the mess, it is temporary!).


    Link: http://kotaku.com/5963528/heres-a-devastating-account-of-the-crap-women-in-the-games-business-have-to-deal-with-in-2012

    Link: http://glvalentine.livejournal.com/tag/readercon


    Link: http://jaymgates.com/misc/wfc-2011-creeper/

    Read More...
  • Yes, this is your author. Inspires a LOT of confidence, doesn't it?

    I was at Readercon last year, but knew nothing of the harassment of Genvieve Valentine until I got home.

    Yeah, the thought of that happening made me mad, as it obviously should. No man should reach adulthood and feel that kind of freedom to harass another human being. Social pressure should have been exerted on that individual from the moment he started exhibiting sings of such aggression.

    Yeah, the thought of it all made me embarrassed on behalf of my other cock-wielding humans. As it should.

    You know what made me feel the most anger and embarrassment, however? Just after the harassment became public knowledge, there were a couple dude-bros — inevitably; dude-bros ruin everything — who opened their goddamn mouths to say something along the lines of, “If only I’d been there, I would’ve done something.”

    Yeah? What would you have done? Defended poor, weak little Genevieve?

    With all due respect (which isn’t much): Fuck you, you failures at life. Put your dicks back in your pants.

    The only time you should be stepping in and helping someone is when their well-being is threatened — when a person is in danger and unable to defend themself. Or when they ask for help. Even then, you’ll probably make the situation worse.

    But here’s the important thing: That scenario has nothing to do with the victim’s sex, the assailant’s sex, or — and here’s the kicker — your sex.

    Yeah, really.

    Genevieve didn’t need any extra help from the penises; if you paid even the slightest attention to her posts on the incident, you’d know she had plenty of supporters with her — supporters she hardly needed, because she handled herself with strength and aplomb.

    #

    I don’t bring this up to go over what has already been gone over, again and again, by others more literate and knowledgeable than I. No, I bring it up because I think such interactions are a good representation of the sophistication of many — far too many — male geeks when confronted with a vagina’d individual:

    BREASTS
    =
    VAGINA / BUTT / LEGS
    =
    ALIEN
    or
    GODDESS
    or
    WHORE
    or
    MOTHER
    = (eventually)
    WOMAN
    or
    GIRL (as their known near-ubiquitously to such men — ahem — boys)
    =
    OH MY GOD IN HEAVEN IT’S A GIRL LOOK
    IT’S BOOBS AND UNDER THERE THERE’S A
    SNATCH AND STARE STARE STARE STARE
    =
    CREEPER SNAPSHOT
    or
    INAPPROPRIATE COME-ON
    or (if he’s one of those shy Nice Guys)
    WILDLY MISOGYNISTIC COMMENT LATER ON WOW FORUM

    I’d love, absolutely love, to have a more positive view, but despite any forward momentum gained (and no one will deny that there’s been some), this last year’s been yet another confirmation that male geek “culture” is producing maladjusted individuals at a disappointingly robust rate. I hardly need to provide links; male geeks behaving badly toward female geeks has been all the rage over the interwebs.

    It’s disappointing as hell, frankly. It’s one of the few things that makes me want to be part of another scene.

    #

    Don’t get me wrong: I’m not immune to my culture, geeky or otherwise. I’m not now claiming — nor would I ever claim — that I always act consistently with my stated beliefs. Sometimes, I think sexist thoughts. Disappointingly often, I say things or make assumptions based on these sexist thoughts. It’s an ongoing struggle to unlearn what my culture has told me about the differences between women and men. It’s even harder to let go of the privilege I’ve been born to just because I’ve got a dick and can grow a (neck)beard.

    Wha--? A woman? But this is MY Christopher Nolan Batman Trilogy forum! I smeared poop on my computer to prevent things like this from happening!

    But I keep on with the struggle.

    Why? Because I don’t want to view women as less than they are, and — far more importantly — I don’t want women to be held back by my (and my bejohnsoned peers’) prejudice.

    If someone as immature, as indoctrinated, as neuronally-slow as me gets this — or, at the very least, sees that the disparity is entirely unjust and harmful and that something should be done about it — why is it so hard for others to make even a rudimentary effort to change their mindsets?

    Why do so many refuse to see that there’s a problem at all? Why do so many insist that fandom is diverse and welcoming, when the limits of this claim are so clearly defined? Why must there be all this fucking butthurt when a righteous volley is launched at the walls of the palace of geekdom? Do male geeks not realize that self-criticism is necessary for growth?

    But maybe these geeks don’t want to grow up. Maybe it’s more urgent to them that they keep the wiminz out of the borders of their ever shrinking kingdoms than reevaluate their prejudice.

    Maybe the right to tell a boob joke without reprisal is just that important to them.

    #

    If any of the above seems too harsh to any of you guys reading, then you can kindly pull your scrotum up over your head, click the Exit button, and go back to living blind, calcifying in a room that reeks of sweat, masturbation, Cheetos, and failure.

    Real people — no, I won’t say real men — face the charges coming at them. They FIX SHIT.

    I’m angry; I think this is clear. The subject enrages me because I fucking love the science fiction, fantasy, and horror folks who have adopted me with open arms. (For years, I was alone in my geekdom, a silent observer. Only in the last three years have a I really come out.) I’m upset because I’m aware that those arms would likely have been a little less open to me if I were a woman (or a person of color, or a non-cisgendered individual, etc.). I’m upset, basically, because there is a situation under our noses that demands action, and so many people are denying it exists.

    I’m pissed because I KEEP TALKING and — moreover — feeling largely justified for doing so. It’s easy to feel you have an audience when you’re whole life you’ve been made to feel important because you’re a man, and white, and…

    Yeah. It’s all a big unfair mess. Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s great that guys like Scott Lynch speak up against bigots, but for all the attention he’s received you’d think he invented cold fusion. Why aren’t more women being celebrated for knocking in the teeth of gross fanboys?

    I’ll tell you why. It’s because the most vocal part of our community is made comfortable by the knowledge that the act of righteousness comes from a verifiably male (and white, and cisgendered) source. This group of geeks gets to pat itself on the back for being so amazingly buttkickingly awesome, all without having to confront the nasty OTHER.

    #

    Ah, shit. Whatever. I’m going to wrap this up, because I’ve just reread what I wrote and become disgusted by my overabundance of words and self-righteousness. I won’t erase it, however, because I think it’s just enough to prove my point that male geeks are still doing too much of the talking where women are concerned in this community.

    Read More...
  • “Male Feminists: You Don’t Get a Cookie” was the name of a panel I was on at WisCon a few years back.  The ironic title referred to the long standing, but sadly not recognized-enough conceit that “You don’t get to receive a bunch of accolades for just being a decent human being.”  It was a panel about what men can do to be supportive allies in the struggle for gender equity.

    There were a lot of basic progressive 101 ideas that came out of it… Listen, don’t talk over your allies…  Don’t assume your experiences are directly applicable to people who have less agency, or different life opportunities…. Don’t assume that women always need a man’s help or protection, but learn to recognize if and when they do… There were a lot of things discussed that many people SHOULD know but sadly don’t seem to.  And yes, at some point during the panel, someone threw a cookie at me.

    One of the important things for me was that it provided a “safe” place (flying cookies aside) for me to talk about my experience of being a world fantasy judge, during a year when all the judges were male. That judging experience was one of the first times I was front and center for a round of “gender politics” in the SF/Fantasy community. And it directly involved me, in both a professional and fannish capacity. I had a lot of conflicting feelings about that experience, and the panel was good place to talk about it and get feedback from like minded people in the community.

    Sadly, this would not be the last time issues of gender inequity reared their head and forced me to be an active participant. Recently, there was an ugly incident at a convention.  I’m going to speak in general terms, and not name specific people or places (Though I suspect a lot of you will recognize the incident I’m talking about).

    While attending a convention, there was a man who serially engaged in inappropriate behavior. Multiple times Thursday night…. Multiple times Friday night…. And again on Saturday night….  A very proactive (and heroic, IMO) member of the community took it upon herself to document The Creepers actions and bring his behavior to the attention of the con organizers. Any convention is busy, and time is a commodity that nobody has enough of. And this member of the community spent a lot of her time and energy to make sure the convention was safer for everyone.

    During Saturday evening this person… this Hero… approached me, and asked me to come with her, right then, and talk with the convention organizers. I had been very aware of what was going on, and what she was doing. Several of my authors were subjected to The Creepers aggression, and I had been pro-active in putting them, and anybody else who had an experience with The Creeper in touch with The Hero, so she would have even more information to help get The Creeper ejected.

    But she approached me early Saturday night and said, “I need YOU to go talk to the conventions organizers with me. Right now.” At first I was a bit confused. I asked her what she needed me to do. And she said it very simply. “Tell them what you know about the creeper, and his actions.” As her flat, un-dramatic, emotionless tone washed over me, I realized what was going on.  And I was simultaneously horrified and angry and embarrassed.

    This person… this Hero, who was spending her very limited time and energy trying to make the convention a better and safer experience for everybody, was not being taken seriously. Because she was a woman. Because she didn’t have enough social or professional standing to overcome the kneejerk reaction to a woman’s complaints about sexual harassment. It was embarrassing… Humiliating really. To realize that our little genre community… the convention that I had been attending for years… was a very hostile place… a very backwards place. A place where I was listened to and a female colleague was not, because she was a woman.

    I was glad I was able to help. My professional standing and gender encouraged the organizers to take the complaints seriously. And the creeper was ejected soon after I spoke with the organizers.

    And I was so fucking angry that the information had to come from me, or someone like me. There are heroes out there.. this one in particular, and hundreds of others… all working there asses off to make sure that the shared social space is safer for everyone.  They gather information and they present it to people in authority, and if things go really well, actions are taken. And if things don’t go well, best case scenario, the creepers keep harassing. And in just one worst case scenario, the Heroes get tarred and feathered with slurs like “thin skinned” or “troublemaker” or  “bitch” or worse.

    And every time one of these hero’s defamed, or intimidated, or silenced, the SF/F community is very much the poorer for it. Not everybody is in a place or has the resources to be a hero. But most people can stand up for Heroes… to support them… with words and deeds and actions. It may not be easy. Some people may be going against peer pressure, or face professional repercussions for not remaining silent. But, as experience showed me, support is sometimes painfully necessary.

    I was very glad that I was able to help put an end to a possibly dangerous situation at that convention. But I was saddened and frustrated that my voice was needed in that particular instance, because someone was already there, shouting at the top of her lungs. And it wasn’t enough. There’s a lot of work that needs to be done, in terms of gender equity, and as the last few years of internet controversies, and convention incidents have shown, there is a lot of work that needs to be done in the SF/F community.

    This is one of the reasons why I chose this topic for this weeks series of author blogs at Night Bazaar. It’s not an easy thing to talk about. But it needs to be. I have this Night Bazaar Soap Box. And I’m very proud of the authors who are willing to step up on it and add to the conversation. Some people may come out of this conversation looking like a hero. Others may end up with cookies thrown at them. Most will end up somewhere between these extremes.  But we need to have this conversation. Because I want my sister, and my wife, and my daughter, and ALL of my authors, be they female, or queer, or of color, or differently-abled, or whatever, to feel safe in this community – in both its virtual spaces, and in the meat spaces of its conventions.

    I’ll finish by reiterating this one small thing that I took from this convention experience. If you have a voice, or position of privilege or authority that could in some small way help one of the Heroes out there… Be supportive. Be loud and vocal and proactive.

    Be generous with your support of The Heroes who get down in the muck and fight for ideals that you believe in.

    Read More...