Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts in the "POV" Category

  • This week we’re talking about narrative point of view, a topic close to my rotten, diseased heart. My nearest and dearest will tell you that there is nothing I love more than annoying the living bejeezus out of readers by using an atypical POV.

    Mind you, this only really works (for me) in short fiction. With novels, I always gravitate toward first-person. But more on that later. First, let me brag about my bad-ass POV-fu, and how annoying it is. I swear, sometimes I think I’m going to get myself knifed! Like the time I opened a story with a long passage in second-person future subjunctive. (“If you were to go downtown on a Saturday, maybe you’d be looking for this particular corner…then if you were to knock on the door and say, ‘I’m here to annoy readers’…”)

    You woulda thought I’d just been caught in public badmouthing Joss Whedon!

    Of course, far more common is my fondness for second-person. I love this shit, because it calls into question who exactly the viewpoint character is. My love of second-person narration is well known among my small circle of beta readers. (I even co-wrote two romantic books all in second-person.) Lots of people hate that.

    Then, of course, there’s the fact that I love present tense. That’s not POV, but it certainly relates directly to it; tense and POV are the two most central (and easily variable) things about any piece of fiction writing.

    Well, present tense may be popular with MFA students and lit professors, as proof that a work is “literary.” It may be a beloved variation that I gallop to whenever I get bored. But to read online forums, this absolutely flips many genre readers out. And yet, you’ll find it laced throughout my very favorite period of literature, the science fiction New Wave of the 1960s. There, experimenting with format was one of the new innovations that some of SF’s most brilliant writers brought to the table, and it set the groundwork for the vast expansion of SF as a literary genre. (more…)

    Read More...
  • Okay, POV. Point of view. Funny though, first thing I thought when I saw this subject was persistence of vision. Not the crappy Dali painting that all the potheads love – wait, that’s The Persistence of Memory. Whatevs. I’m talking about the physical phenomenon of the persistence of vision, the brain’s limited bandwidth and throughput when dealing with visual sensation.

    Here’s how it works, and I’m going to quote my work in progress, Incarcerado, because why do the same work twice, I ask you? Here it be: (more…)

    Read More...
  • When the first glimmers of The Winds of Khalakovo were running through my mind, I had planned on having only one character: Nikandr Khalakovo. As I started to work through the story and the world, both of which quickly became larger, I realized I needed at least one more POV. A conflict develops within the Grand Duchy, and I wanted to be able to tell the both sides of this story. The second character I chose was Atiana Vostroma, the woman Nikandr is betrothed to, a woman who both frustrates and intrigues Nikandr.

    I was happy with this choice, and I continued on my merry way, writing the first handful of chapters of the book. But as I continued, it felt like a goodly portion of the story was missing. In the book, the ruling class of the Grand Duchy of Anuskaya are fighting against a sustained guerrilla campaign by a splinter sect of the peace-loving Aramahn. They’re known as the Maharraht, and although their roots are non-violent, they’ve become ruthless so that their brothers and sisters don’t have to. They fight to defend the Aramahn, who won’t lift a hand in their own defense. After mulling this over for a bit, considering ways I could reveal their story, I decided that I couldn’t leave their POV out. I had to show them, because it was through these people that the reader would come to know both the Aramahn and the Maharraht.

    So in some ways, POVs are a tool the writer can use to illuminate their world. I write epic fantasy, and part of the thrill of reading those kinds of books is that you get to explore a wide swath of the world. For me, it’s important to do this, to explore not only characters, not only the physical place of the world, but the cultures as well. In other words, for me, POVs are not only characters, they’re lenses through which we can view the shades of culture and politics that exist in the world. Now, I certainly could have had the main characters interact with people from these various cultures—and they do—but I also wanted to shed light on the psyche of the secretive Maharraht, and the way that felt right to me was to include one of them as a POV character.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • Point of view, while being basic to the mechanics of story, is complex in it’s simplicity — that is, there’s an art to it like much of writing. On the surface, it looks like an easy thing. Pick a POV. Done. It isn’t until you’ve practiced writing for a while that you begin to see the layers of subtlety behind these kinds of decisions. Yes, fashion does come into it. At the moment, first person is all the rage and omniscient third is totally er… not — at least in America. The trouble is, not everyone writes well in first person. Also, first person isn’t the easiest POVs to pull off. Frankly, it’s the toughest to do well and isn’t something I’d recommend for beginners. First person requires a Voice to hook the reader for one thing. Lack that Voice and the story will be dull as a corporate accountant’s suit. Have multiple POV? Even more difficult because you have to have multiple Voices, and each must stand out from the rest. That way the reader can tell the difference in characters. (It’s the same with dialog, really.) So, whatever you do, don’t decide on a POV just because everyone else is doing it. Even if some people claim that it’s one of the markers of a genre.* Write in the POV that best serves your story. In fact, if there’s one universal rule about writing, that’s the one: Do What Best Serves The Story. POV as a gimmick for gimmick’s sake? Yeah. That just gets between the reader and the story. Bad idea, that. Don’t do anything by accident. Real writers create with purpose.

    Me? I’m most comfortable with a tight third person POV. There may come a time when I’ll need to write in first person — there also may come a time when I’ll need to write in omniscient third. I reserve the right to decide based on the story.

    Anyway, I’ll never forget my first workshop with instructors who were working professional writers. One of the students asked the question, “How do I choose the right POV character?” I can’t remember who answered the question, for the life of me. At least one author recommended trying out various points of view for the scene.** The second answer came from an older woman. She had a wonderful genteel Southern accent and had a no-nonsense attitude. She looked the student straight in the eye with that laser gaze of hers and said, “That would be the character whose goat gets f*cked.” It’s a memorable way to make the point. Story is about conflict for the most part. Tension, in whatever form, is the goal. Tension keeps your reader reading. So, what’s the simplest means of maintaining tension? It comes down to which character has the most at stake. Mind you, there are exceptions to every rule.***  But this is a good rule of thumb to have. And you have to admit, it is kind of fun to say.

    ————————————-

    * Yes, there are those who claim that it isn’t Urban Fantasy unless it’s written in first person. There are also those who’ll claim that all YA should be first person. [cough] They’re full of crap. [cough]

    ** A great exercise, if you’ve the time. Seriously. There’s no better way to illustrate the distinctions than putting the tires to the pavement. Seriously.

    *** Except for doing what’s best for the story, and I’ll even allow that there might be an exception for that. Doubtful, but it’s possible.

    Read More...
  • Courtney SchaferSome people think I’m crazy for my choice of POV style in The Whitefire Crossing. I have two main characters (one a mountain guide who moonlights as a smuggler, the other a mage), and I alternate between their points of view – standard fare for a fantasy novel – but here’s the kicker: I wrote my smuggler in 1st person and my mage in tight 3rd.

    This isn’t unheard of – Jonathan Stroud wrote his Bartimaeus books in similar style, for example – but it’s rare enough that I get a lot of people asking why I chose to write the book that way.

    The surface answer is that when I first wrote Whitefire, I wasn’t worrying over what potential readers might think, since I hadn’t yet thought of publication. When I started that very first draft, I played around with both 1st and 3rd for my two protagonists, and found that one flowed best for me in 1st, the other in 3rd. I remember thinking at the time, Maybe I should force myself to choose one style…but then I thought, what for? I’m writing this for myself, and since I’m not the sort of reader who minds POV switching of that nature, why not go with what my gut wants? So I happily forged ahead. When the book was finished (and revised) and I decided to seek publication, I did wonder if the POV switches would cause agents to balk. (Thankfully it didn’t – out of all the agents who read partials and fulls, only one cited the POV switching as an issue.)

    But that’s not the real answer.   (more…)

    Read More...
  • Erin Hoffman is a novelist and video game designer from California. Her short fiction and poetry have appeared in Beneath Ceaseless Skies, Electric Velocipede, Asimov’s, and others, and she writes nonfiction for The Escapist, a leading game industry magazine.

    Well, hello! Night Bazaar — what a neat concept. Thank you for having me.

    Oh, point of view. Den of thorns and shipwrecker of dreams. Actually, it’s not that bad.

    Point of view in particular I think tends to be a matter of fashion, which can also be a matter of region, or in our case, subgenre. Mainstream fantasy tends to be dominated by third person, predominantly multi-perspective these days, with rare forays into omniscient third. First person seems to indicate literary aspiration. Then you jump over to paranormal romance and it’s all first person, an inheritance from mystery. All of this is mostly subliminal communication with the reader: I am familiar, I am what you like, I get you and we get it so let us dance together in the moonlight.

    Sword of Fire and Sea is my first novel, but I’ve written and had published stories in a variety of points of view: first person, third person, omniscient/fable. Poetry, likewise, in a variety. I made a specific decision with the Chaos Knight to use an extremely close third that had mostly to do with pacing and characterization.

    (more…)

    Read More...