Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts in the "The Joys of Research" Category

  • We’re talking about the joys of research this week, and I can simply direct your attention to the picture accompanying this entry as evidence of the joy of research. Mmmmm. Books. However, there’s a seedy underbelly to research wherein you end up with shelves like this. This is the “Occult Wall” in my office–just the books that reference the occult history of the world.

    You can go too far with research. You can wander off into the wilderness and never find your way back, which is detrimental when you have a book deadline.

    Most of the Occult Wall was put together while working on Lightbreaker and Heartland, the first two volumes in the Codex of Souls (also from Night Shade Books). More than a few of these books I’ve not read all the way through, mainly because I bought them when I was “doing” research for the book. When the actual plot of the book went in a different direction, well, I still had the research material. That shelf there–the second one down from the top on the far left–none of that made it into the final draft.

    For Earth Thirst, I wanted to not stress my bank account unnecessarily, and so I purposefully did only the minimum research necessary to keep the plot moving. Once I got a draft of the book done, only then did I go allow myself to do the heavy research. I still only ended up reading half of the books I picked up, but this time I only bought a single shelf’s worth instead of an entire bookcase. In some ways, this mirrors the respective protagonists of the aforementioned books: Markham lives in a very symbolic world, one that is rich with layers of inference and meaning; Silas is much more pragmatic, only bothering with concrete details that get him from point A to point B.

    Midway through writing Earth Thirst, I got a call from Night Shade asking about a series title. “Are we doing a series?” I asked, and they just laughed. They know my predilection for research, you see. They remember the conversation we had one night at a convention where I rattled off the very explicit ten volume plan for the CODEX books, even though they had only bought two. After we settled on The Arcadian Conflict, I yanked about thirty thousand words out of the manuscript for Earth Thirst because, well, it’s plot that can be saved for later.

    The other half of the books on my Arcadia research shelf are about dirt. Who knew there were so many books written about dirt?

    That phrase comes up regularly during research. Who knew? More than one book owes its genesis to that phrase. Research used to scare me; now, I fear it for a different reason entirely. I have a book to finish. It has a defined scope. It’s supposed to come in at one hundred thousand words. Research can upset all of that.

    How many books are there in The Arcadian Conflict? I’m not sure. But let me do a little research and get back to you.

    Read More...
  • Me, responding to the thought of doing research.

    Tips: The Joys of Research.

    This is my topic? Really? Oh, good grief. JOY and RESEARCH do not belong in the same sentence—or even the same thought.

    A research project is what a teacher assigns to a student in order to destroy that student’s joy. A research partner is someone who leaches joy from your life.

    Research is to joy, as a knife wound is to… an orgasm?

    RESEARCH

    No, I don’t like research; I think that’s clear. I write about people on other planets in order not to have to do too much research.

    (Okay, that’s not the whole reason I write about people on other planets—it’s not even one of the main reasons, honestly—but it is one of the reasons.)

    #

    I mean, think about this situation:

    Your name is Connie Willis. You write a two-part novel called Blackout/All Clear, which uses London as a set piece. Many, many readers in the UK criticize you—rather harshly—for your horrible mangling of the city’s geography. You are derided as yet another American author appropriating Merry Ol’ England for your own use without doing the proper research.

    And so you feel like a fool. A failure. Why-oh-why did you ever try to write about REAL PLACES?

    But wait…

    Your novel goes on to win the Nebula.

    And then it wins the Locus.

    And then—then!—it wins the Hugo.

    #

    So, to recap what we’ve just learned: Unless you’re seeking the approval of Londoners, research is unnecessary.

    Yay! No more research for me!

    #

    #

    The cover of NO RETURN, sans design elements. Art by Robbie Trevino.

    Zachary Jernigan is the author of NO RETURN, which comes out from Night Shade Books on the 5th of March, 2013.

    He wants to make it clear that the above is not intended to denigrate Connie Willis, a great author of many great books, including BLACKOUT/ALL CLEAR. He has no idea if the geography in her book is off, being entirely unfamiliar with London. He does, however, think it’s awesome that her book could win on literary and speculative merits while still being so (apparently) off on so many of the detaily bits.

    Read More...
  • According to Robert Graves, the Roman emperor Claudius was a stuttering, gimpy intellectual who nevertheless managed to conquer Britain with minimal Roman losses. Instead of praising him for it, his critics complained that his victory “smelled of the lamp”—meaning it was not the honorable result of straightforward manly action, but a cheap trick conjured up by an overgrown schoolboy fingering his books in the unwholesome light of stinky oil lamps. The implication being that by studying the problem in great detail, and solving it without vast casualties, Claudius had cheated.

    Ah, the rewards of research.

    Research has changed a lot since I first started writing.  It used to mean spending a lot of time in libraries and bookstores, which I loved doing anyway, but now of course Google has made that kind of fact-finding obsolete, so that with a minimum of effort anybody can find out anything about anything.  Knowledge is cheap: the smartest person on Earth is no match for a schmuck with a Smartphone.

    Ah well, life experience is the best kind of research for an author anyhow. That’s been the basis for most of my books—I always start with a solid core of personal experience and then build the story around that.

    For instance, my first novel, Xombies (re-released as Xombies: Apocalypse Blues), is about a girl escaping from a zombie-like plague, who takes refuge aboard a nuclear submarine.  This sub plot was no accident—I actually worked at a company that manufactured nuclear submarines, which was where the idea first hit me that a submarine could be the ideal vehicle for an I Am Legend-type story.  Once I had that piece of the puzzle, the book came together very quickly.

    Personal experience also informed my novel Enormity, which is the tale of a nebbishy American living in Korea, who suddenly finds himself transformed into a sky-high colossus.  Well, the colossus part I made up, but I already knew a bit about Korea, having lived there for three years.  The main research I had to do for that book was on the physics of scale, with a bit of quantum mechanical jargon to “explain” how it all happened.  There is a kind of poetic Jabberwocky quality to this stuff—it’s not necessary to know what any of it means.

    Likewise, technical jargon is used satirically in my novel Mad Skills, the story of an ordinary teenage girl whose brain is damaged in an accident, but who is given a second chance by the miracle of science—specifically, a computerized brain implant that makes her a walking, talking, ass-kicking search engine.  Of course, total knowledge has its downside; not many of us want to know the whole truth about ourselves, or the horrors perpetrated for our convenience.  When the girl fights back against those who would exploit her, she turns ordinary household items into deadly weapons.  This was a fun part of my research on Mad Skills, playing MacGyver by combining a bicycle and a chain saw to make a motorcycle, or building a shotgun out of a blowdryer, a shower-curtain rod, and a can of hairspray.  Don’t try this at home, kids!

    My most recent book, Terminal Island, is practically a memoir of my experiences on Catalina Island…though with the addition of a murderous death-cult.  In setting the scene for Terminal Island, I deliberately avoided researching modern-day Catalina, preferring to draw on my more dreamlike childhood memories of the place.  Most of my research was on ancient religions and their rites, particularly the cult of Dionysus, but I already had a bit of background on this, having studied the Greek Myths in college.  Once again, the point of using such material wasn’t to deliver a history lecture, but to plausibly bring the gruesome past into the present—the reader is not required to have any expertise.  In fact, the book is probably is more horrifying without knowledge of its historical basis, because then it is all just a surreal nightmare.

    Thanks for reading!

    Read More...
  • Congratulations to my esteemed co-blogger John Hornor Jacobs, whose Southern Gods hits stores this week. He’s giving away a free signed copy to a randomly-selected commenter this week. Just comment on any of this week’s posts for a chance to win.

    The Pleasures and Terrors of Research and/or “Inspiration,” If You’re the Sort of Person Who Calls It That

    I’m crappy at research, because I very quickly get convinced I don’t know enough on a given topic to write anything. For instance, I had this awesome plan to write a novel set in the Caucasus until I confused my Avars with my Cherkessians, and that is never a good idea.

    What works better for me is to consume a lot of information on topics I’m interested in. Sooner or later, something comes back up — to use an unsavory digestive metaphor that my detractors would surely find all too accurate.

    Once lightning has struck, to use a less alimentary and more complimentary metaphor, the problem is to fact-check things that came exploding out of my brain. They’re rarely as accurate as I hoped, but they’re rarely as wrong as I feared.

    In my  first novel The Panama Laugh (which is in stores, I’m told, incidentally — holy shit!), I had read some things that inspired me in the first place — I’ll talk about those in a minute. But there are a lot of machines of one form or another in my zombie apocalypse, from molecular to nuclear-powered. When it came time to figure out if I’d biffed it on the technical details, most of the things I imagined I’d gotten wrong — or not as right as they could be — were the sort of thing I couldn’t find in books or online.

    For those, I found people who knew something about the topic — when possible. The Panama Laugh features ships and small civilian airplanes and a blimp and a zeppelin and the Panama Canal, and a castle, and guns…lots and lots of guns. Information about small civilian airplanes was provided by two friends who are pilots. I’m lucky enough to know a graduate of the California Maritime Academy who helped immensely in figuring out where to put the bilge bay and what Shaft Alley would sound like. I already knew a fair amount about guns, but Alan Beatts at Borderlands Books knows a whole lot more. Crime writer Christa Faust knows a thing or two about Lucha Libre, which figures briefly in The Panama Laugh. These people and others were extremely generous with their time and expertise.

    On many other topics, I was pretty much on my own. I sometimes looked for people online who could answer questions, but it just wasn’t always practical or necessary. On certain topics, I had to find out things for myself — which takes a lot of Google searches, a lot of time checking Wikipedia references, and a lot of time tracking down books at the library. It takes a lot longer than having an expert on tap. But in many cases, doing online research and looking things up provided that thing I value far more than accuracy in my writing — inspiration. (more…)

    Read More...
  • It’s finally out!  John J Horner’s Southern Gods! Comment on a post this week and you might win a free copy!

    While it would be lovely if the Internet has magically solved all our research needs, there are definitely soft spots in the data shell.  Yes, online thesauruses and dictionaries help us find and use words like defenstration, but good Youtube videos of it?  Still a work in progress.   For the longest time, I had a hard time finding in-depth medical knowledge (Normal ranges for bilirubin in urine sample or  X-rays of all the varieties of morphology of the human spleen, for example).  It was a dead zone, but that has been filling in.  Same thing for abstract mathematical theory.  You usually have to go get the book.   There still isn’t a comprehensive searchable online database for math research, but Google Research has its moments.

    At the other end of the spectrum is researching your characters.  How does a Muslim fireman in Bolivia feel about marriage?  What would a vat-born cyborg soldier think about raising kids?  Yes, there are a million blogs out there, a million voices shouting unheard, but if you really go looking, it’s hard to find truly interesting people talking about what makes them interesting.  For example, I wanted to research this idea for a Water World concept, so I went looking for boat people blogs.  Sure they are out there, but nobody just online journaling about how what they had for breakfast, how they shower, their favorite shoes, etc. Actually, Cameron’s blog is really quite good.  A diabetic lesbian science fiction writer in middle America?  That’s frickin’ interesting.  And she occasionally just talks about her life and includes pictures of her blinged out insulin kit?  That’s a good blog.

    Figuring out how to see the world through another person’s eyes is a facet of writing fiction that really requires you to go out and talk to the people of the world.  Which is fine by me.  One of my favorite weekend pastimes is pouring liquor into strangers and asking them wildly inappropriate questions.  (more…)

    Read More...
  • Congratulations and a hearty round of applause goes out to John on the release of his debut, Southern Gods. Remember to comment on any of the posts this week for a chance to win a copy!

    I have to admit right off the bat that I don’t read a lot of non-fiction. First of all, I read slowly. Second of all, I find most non-fiction to be rather dry. Probably I’m reading the wrong books, because I have found ones that I enjoy. Jared Diamond’s Guns, Germs, and Steel jumps to mind, as does Thomas Cahill’s Hinges of History series.

    In any case, what I tend to do is research a somewhat wide area around the story I’m working with, though not too deeply at all, and then I start diving into specifics. For The Winds of Khalakovo, I researched Muscovite Russia, Russian culture, customs, and so on, just to steep myself in the period. Winds is not a one-for-one with that place and time, so I wasn’t too worried about historical accuracy, but I wanted to get the right sense of it. I wanted to give the impression that the story was playing out in a fully realized world with fully realized cultures.

    I also spent some time with Medieval Persia, and a bit on Ottoman Turkey, because these two cultures come into play quite a bit as well (especially in the second and third books in the series). Once I had a decent idea of what the world felt like, I dove into the story, coming back to the research now and again to stay true to the things that got me excited about them in the first place.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • KameronHurley Hey, we’re giving away more FREE, awesome books! This week it’s the southern gothic/noir/horror novel Southern Gods by John Horner Jacobs. Comment here or on any other post at the Night Bazaar this week to enter to win.
    ____________________________________________________________________
    I’m a historian by training, which is a fancy way of saying I spent four years kicking around fallout-shelter-like libraries in Alaska and dusty archives in South Africa, trying to find links between unrelated bits of recorded knowledge and then writing more-or-less intelligently about them.

    It was great training for fiction writing, really.

    When it comes to creating new people and new worlds, you’re only as good as what you take in. So if all you’ve ever read are Tolkien knock-off’s and endless re-runs of Saved by the Bell, well, it’s highly likely that your fiction is going to sound a lot like a watered-down Tolkien ripoff populated by 20th century teens. Garbage in, garbage out, and all that.

    I’ve been asked quite a bit about worldbuilding, and how exactly do you do it? And the answer is, well, you don’t really. You’re not really making things up. You’re just taking existing things and smooshing them together in new and different ways. But in order to do that, you need to actually… know things.

    I know!

    So before I embark on any big project, I’ll spend 3-6 months just… reading stuff. When I finished a (now trunked) fantasy saga and went on the lookout for a new series to write, I already had some knowledge of female revolutionaries and guerilla fighters from my work delving into how the African National Congress recruited female fighters during the apartheid era. From there, I branched out into all sorts of stuff. Half a dozen books on the genocide in Rwanda. Books on more modern warfare, and killing, and military history in general. Then came books on Iran, the Iranian revolution, Assyria and Babylon, half a dozen books on Islam, some stuff on Roman-era Christianity and marriage, Islamic feminism, Iraq and the Iran-Iraq war, Afghanistan, and more western feminism and military history books.

    Basically, if I found something vaguely interesting, I picked it up at the library – that and dozens of others at the same time. I’d pick and choose from every stack, skimming or tossing ones that were no longer interesting, and culling the bibliographies from some of my favorite for more reading ideas. The books I really, really liked – or that I got for cheap at big library sales – I went ahead and bought. My book shelves look like about what you’d expect – weird fiction, feminism, southern African history, Middle Eastern history, and war books. Lots and lots of war books.

    Ideas come from everywhere, and if you’re lacking in funds to travel, books are the best place to look. Libraries are the best. It lets you just pile on 20-30 books at a time, sift through them, and keep winnowing and refining until you find what you were looking for.

    Once I knew I wanted to write about a team of bounty hunters, I returned to a few fantasy favorites to see how they’d accomplished that peculiar tension that drives the best groups of mercenaries and outcasts.

    I suppose I’m a big believer in research, though I can’t pretend any of this was really formal. Basically, I sat down with a notebook and simply took notes on interesting things. Printed out interesting architecture/evocative landscapes, etc. After a few months, everything just sort of percolated into the opening of God’s War, with a bounty hunter on the run who’d just sold her womb for liquor in a grand attempt to lose her pursuers. I had no idea why exactly doing this would help her get away, and certainly had no idea that the book had bugs and magicians in it, but it was a start. I had a character tied to a setting, and some tension to start.
    It was enough.

    Building the world happened as I was writing the book – and well after I completed the first draft. To some extent, I do this with a lot of fiction. The first pass is just throwing stuff onto the page and seeing what sticks. It’s the constant revisions – which often take 3-4 times longer than writing the book – when I actually figure out how everything works, and make it as unique as I possibly can.

    And the key to that?

    Research.

    Garbage in, garbage out.

    The next time somebody tells you they just “make stuff up” ask them why the earth revolves around the sun in their books. Or why the sun sets in the west…. Or why it doesn’t. Everything we create is based on our own thoughts and experiences and the media and information we choose to ingest.

    So choose wisely.

    Read More...
  • A lot of people enjoy being dead. But they are not dead, really. They’re just backing away from life. *Reach* out. Take a *chance*. Get *hurt* even. But play as well as you can. Go team, go! Give me an L. Give me an I. Give me a V. Give me an E. L-I-V-E. LIVE! Otherwise, you got nothing to talk about in the locker room. — from Harold and Maude

    Hurray for John and the release of Southern Gods! I haven’t had time to read it yet but my husband has and he enjoyed it quite a lot. (Dane reads much faster than I do, you see.) Anyway, I wish John the best and hope all goes well. John is giving away a free copy. So, comment on this post with a novel set in a different time period that you enjoyed, and you’ll be entered to win.

    This week’s topic is actually a favorite: research. Seems odd, but keeping your setting and characters real is especially important when writing fiction. It helps the reader immerse themselves in your story. Strangely enough, the more you stray from normal, every day life, the more important immersion is. It’s something I learned from reading Horror (my second favorite genre) and Stephen King. So, things I’ve done for research include — a tour of an actual sword forge* where they make Damascus steel, taking Irish language lessons, reading a great deal of nonfiction, studying other genres**, fencing lessons (Japanese and Western European styles), horseback riding, auto mechanics, and rally racing. Most of all, writers have to have a keen sense of observation because so much relies on your ability to recreate reality for a reader. How do people really talk to one another?*** What’s it like to get your heart broken? What’s it like to lose a parent? What’s it like to fall in love? What does it feel like to laugh? Cry? Dive into cold water from a great height? Skin your knee? Dance? Have surgery? Survive a car accident? Ride a motorcycle? Experiences are key. You’ve only your experiences to pull from. That’s why so many great authors are older. They’ve had time to experience life. It’s also one of the reasons why so many great authors are famous for having a million really odd jobs over the expanse of their careers. (That, and the lack of a regular income.) Of course, it’s possible to use others’ experiences. So, interviewing others is important as well. (But one has to listen, really listen.) Interviews combined with your own experiences are your best tools.

    Do you need to be an expert in everything? No. But you do need to be familiar enough to provide key cues to the reader. They’ll fill in the rest for themselves. They need to exercise their own imagination, or they’ll grow bored. So, you’ll have to allow space for that. (That is, don’t put all your research out on the page. There’s no faster way to bore a reader.)

    Long story short… live your life. There aren’t many professions where that’s a requirement. Literature, done well, is about life after all — yes, even Science Fiction and Fantasy.

    ——————————–
    * There’s one located in Wimberly which isn’t far from Austin. It was amazing.

    ** It’s a good idea to read outside your chosen genre. Limiting your reading to one genre also limits your creativity.

    *** I’ll give you a hint, it isn’t how it’s done in television in film.

    Read More...
  • Congratulations to John on the release of Southern Gods!  I can’t wait to read it myself – it’s sitting on my Kindle whispering read me now, read me now…sadly, I’ve had to hold to a strict “work before reading” policy this month, lest I get buried under an avalanche of book-related and day job tasks.  But oh gosh, it sounds awesome.  (Don’t believe me?  Go check out John’s Big Idea piece at Scalzi’s blog.)  So don’t forget, comment on this post to tell me a novel you enjoyed that was set in a different time period, and you’ll be entered to win a free copy!

    This week we’re talking about what kinds of research we’ve done for our books. In my case, most of the research needed for The Whitefire Crossing was completed long before I so much as dreamed of writing a book.

    I first put on a climbing harness and scrabbled up a cliff back in my sophomore year at Caltech. (For a college full of scrawny physics and math geeks, Caltech has an awesome selection of P.E. courses. Rock climbing, scuba diving, wind surfing…guess they figure they’ve got to tempt the nerds out of the labs somehow, or else our muscles would atrophy away entirely.) (more…)

    Read More...
  • J M McDermott‘s first novel was plucked from a slush pile and went on to be #6 on Amazon.com’s Year’s Best SF/F of 2008, shortlisted for a Crawford Prize, and on Locus Magazine’s Recommended Reading List for Debuts. His short fiction has appeared in Weird Tales Magazine, Fantasy Magazine, Apex Magazine, and Lady Churchill’s Rosebud Wristlet, among other places. He has a BA in Creative Writing from the University of Houston, and an MFA in Popular Fiction from the Stonecoast program of the University of Southern Maine. By night, he wanders a maze of bookshelves and empty coffee cups, and by day he wanders the streets of Atlanta, where he lives and works. He tries to write in between.

    [Editor's Note: J. M. McDermott will give away one copy each of his novels Last Dragon and Never Knew Another to one lucky blog reader - just comment on this post by 11:59PM MDT Saturday August 20th to enter the drawing!]

    I’ve been invited to speak, and told the subject of the week is world-building. Do I have anything to say that I haven’t said before? I suspect I’m writing for writers, here, and not for people who would prefer to identify themselves as readers first, and writers never. In this, I wonder what new can be said on the subject. I can’t think of anything that hasn’t been said before.

    Different processes produce different results. I use Microsoft Excel.  I’ve talked about this before. I like spreadsheets. Some people like to use the same tools they use when they run DnD campaigns. Some people just make it up as they go. Others keep detailed notes, in hand, or draw maps in mapping software, or all sorts of other things. World-building is a good idea in fantasy, because you get to make the world your own.

    What does it matter, really, what tools you use as long as your world suits your narrative?

    Often, I am bored by world-building in the books I read. I’m not really into “cool” worlds. I read for characters and to find the questions of my life that I did not know I was supposed to be asking. I mean, really, what matter whether a river is purple or a mountain is made of glass if the people of that world are not changed by it in some fashion, and not just in that they need special shoes to walk on the purple water and climb the glass mountains? I mean imagine that the glass of the mountain is a metaphor for a bright, shining, religious lie, and it is so massive that all the stained glass windows in the world have been thrown up together into one, huge monument to the lies. I mean that the character who climbs this mountain discovers a truth upon it that makes the monument a lie, because the thing that inspired it all was wrong to begin with. Things are different for a reason, and it has to do with art. Otherwise, we’re just messing with reality for the sake of making reality cooler than it is, and it feels lazy to me because reality is actually very cool, already. (more…)

    Read More...