Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts in the "Story Adaptations" Category

  • Thomas S. RocheI am most emphatically NOT someone who believes the oft-repeated claim, “books are better than movies,” or thinks “the movie can never live up to the book.” I think a small but critical number of movies based on books have improved greatly on the source material.

    And, for the record, here’s my final word on adaptations as a writer: any time someone wants film rights to one of my works, they can have them for the right price, and I’ll cheerfully wash my hands.

    I’ve written scripts and I love writing scripts. I’ve written novels and I love writing novels. They’re two completely different experiences. I don’t have much desire to do adaptations, especially of my own work. Anyone who wants to adapt my work can have carte blanche to bugger it once my agent gets the briefcase of money, or better yet the duffel bag. Thereafter, I won’t badmouth you in the press. I won’t even visit the set so I can meet Kate Winslet and C. Thomas Howell. As a writer, on the adaptation of my work, I have no opinion.

    But as a fan, on the adaptation of other people’s work, I have lots of opinions.

    The rest of this column is written from the point of view of a very cranky reader and a very cranky film viewer. I am a bitch when it comes to movies, as all my friends will tell you. I love films but I hate almost all the films I see. So take it with a grain of salt.

    At its best, a film adaptation finds the central narrative of the novel and streamlines it. It takes away sub-plots, diversion, a certain amount of leisurely character development and certain other potentially confusing elements, in order to come up — ideally — with the simplest narrative possible, one that can be delivered in 90 to 120 minutes.

    In my opinion that’s not about the audience being stupid, or “most people” being stupid, as I often hear book-writers saying about movies. I consider the view that “movie audiences” are “stupid” to be kinda classist and just plain snooty. Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t. But movies and books are different art forms, and have different needs for satisfying the audience. I’ve read far too many books to pretend that books are, by their nature, “smart.” Most books are f*$#*@ing stupid, period. (more…)

    Read More...
  • When I think about movie adaptations, I can’t help but think of Allen Moore. He’s had more than a few of his graphic novels adapted for the big screen, including Watchmen, V for Vendetta, From Hell, Constantine, and League of Extraordinary Gentlemen. I was a fan of his writing back in the ’80s, especially Watchmen, and when the movie was set to come out, I remember poking around to see what he thought of the production (this was before the movie came out). Lo and behold, he said he wasn’t going to see it. Further, he said if you’d been inflicted with the kind of adaptations he’s been inflicted with, you wouldn’t go see them, either.

    I’m not so sure that’s true. I was not a huge fan of V for Vendetta, and I thought the League of Extraordinary Gentlemen was a thin, candy-like affair that lost all of the mystique and aura of the graphic novel, but I quite liked Watchmen. Even so, I understand where Moore is coming from. It’s bad enough losing control over the title of your novel, the cover, the cover copy, the promotional efforts, even some of the content, when you sell the novel for publication. Selling your work to Hollywood is twenty times worse. A hundred times. Because you lose all control unless you’re big enough to make demands, but really, how many J.K. Rowlings are there in the world?

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • Thanks to John for forging the way and my apologies to the rest of the gang. I’ve been trying to write something coherent but I’ve got two kids with some sort of unholy evil infesting their digestive tracts for the last week. The washing machine broke five days ago and everything I own is covered in vomit. And by vomit, I mean ‘fluids of bodily origin.’ Let’s just leave it at that. I haven’t slept in a fuzzy hazy amount of time. The local exorcist is dodging my calls and I think I may be possessed of the demons now too. Just in time to get in the car and drive four hours to the beach for my little brother’s wedding. Great. Really fan-frickin’-tastic.

    At this point, the word ‘adaptation’ has lost all meaning for me. Most of the English language is out of my field of expertise

    Yeah, I just don't care what this means today.

    this week. There are little steaming files all over my desktop with rambling half-thoughts for stories and characters but it’s all basically gibberish. Modern American life has lost all meaning for me, actually. Mortgages, jobs, SUVs, PTA, credit cards. Why the hell are we all doing this stuff? It’s not even fun. The fun stuff is bad and we’re supposed to be embarrassed about liking wine and sex and sleeping late and goofing off and cheese-covered-everything. We’re supposed to like living in suburbs and reading about politics. I’m so bored by all this I could vomit. Which is why I make up stories about a techie future where life finally gets interesting. Ah. There it is. A moment of clarity. I think I will go vomit now. Have a nice weekend.

    Read More...
  • Not really interested in talking about book adaptations and it probably won’t interest me as a subject of discourse until one of my books gets optioned and then my only contribution to the dialogue will be, “Hey! How much are they gonna pay me?”

    What I want to talk about today is something I’ve touched on in interviews recently, quite often. It’s a subject I keep coming back to and I keep worrying at it like a kid picking a scab. When that happens, I realize that in some way, the subject is important. To me, at least.

    I want to talk about a writer’s confidence. (more…)

    Read More...
  • KameronHurley

    The real secret to doing an adaptation well is to understand that stories are told differently in different mediums. This is where a lot of people go wrong. Taking a comic book and retelling it panel for panel in a movie doesn’t work, nor does painstakingly re-creating every scene in a book. If you know comics, great. But by Prime, if you’re going to write a movie script you better effing know MOVIE SCRIPTS.

    Among writers, I see us doing this a lot with book trailers – a book trailer should not be like reading your book on a screen with a cool background. It is a totally different space – different audience, different expectations, different expectations – and you have to think of the type of story you want to convey there, and make the most of the tools you have. Images, music, and words have to work together in a way we’re really not used to in novels. We also come to novels with far different  time expectations. When I sit down with a novel, I expect I’ll put many hours of reading into it over several sittings. With a YouTube video, I’m not clicking through expecting to spend more than a few seconds on your site, maybe 5 checking out your video before it either hooks me or I get bored. (more…)

    Read More...
  • When it comes to adaptation to film some novels just don’t make it across the gap while others sparkle. I suspect there are a lot of complex factors involved. Some of them have to do with the nature of the book (A Scanner Darkly)–others to do with who is doing the interpretation (The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Going Postal, A Game of Thrones) and still others to do with the budget. For me, the biggest factor in whether an adaptation will be successful or not is whether or not those in charge of the project truly love the story they’re adapting. If they believe in it, something beautiful is much more likely to happen because they’ll protect the core of the story from outside influence. I’m no Hollywood insider, by any means, but this has definitely been my impression*. So, any time I hear that a film is being made of my favorite novel I tend to watch who is assigned to the project. If it’s someone like Peter Jackson or the writers from HBO’s Rome, I’ve hope for the project. If it’s someone who is equally talented but more inclined to doing their own thing with the material (Tim Burton, Guillermo del Toro) then I immediately lower my expectations. Much as I love Burton and del Toro (and I do, I really, really do) I wouldn’t give them a project that wasn’t wholly their own. They both are very much who they are. I guess what I’m saying is, there’s a knack to novel to film adaptation. Some have it. Some don’t. This isn’t a judgement. It’s an acknowledgement of how creative people work.

    What is the worst adaptation I’ve seen? A Wizard of Earthsea. Of course, I hated the SyFy channel’s interpretation of Dune too. I don’t care that it supposedly was closer to the book. It didn’t capture the historical feel of the novels that David Lynch’s version did. (We won’t discuss the Smithee edit of that film. OMG, how that sucked. Lynch was right to take his name off of it.) When Hollywood puts profit ahead of story the result sucks. Which is why, in general, I feel the SyFy channel has committed a large number of crimes against Science Fiction and Fantasy, but that’s another story.

    Of the adaptations I’ve mentioned above, I have to say my favorite is Terry Pratchett’s Going Postal. It’s magical. You can tell that everyone involved adored Pratchett’s work from the instant it hits the screen. It’s a love letter, all of it. The casting is dead perfect–from Richard Coyle as Moist Von Lipwig to Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari. (The only misstep I found was in the casting of Angua and she’s there and gone in an instant anyway.) The acting is spot on as is the script, the set and everything else you could name. If you’ve read the book, definitely see it. Hell, see it even if you haven’t read the book.

    ———————–

    *Largely due to stories about a certain giant mechanical spider and a producer who was determined to drop that sucker in there regardless of which film let alone how or where it was to be fit in. Regardless of whether at bit of hearsay is true or not — any time you have someone with the purse-strings making demands that really have nothing to do with the heart of a project you’re going to go astray.

    Read More...
  • Courtney SchaferWhen I hear that a favorite book is being made into a movie, my first reaction is often “Oh, no” instead of “Oh, yay!”. Mostly because it’s really damn hard to adapt a story to a different media and make it even half as good as the original. If the adapting writer slavishly follows the source material, then all too often you end up with something lifeless and boring, because the strengths of one media don’t translate well to another. (E.g. novels can portray the rich inner lives of characters with ease, but movies? You’re heavily dependent on the skills of the actors, and even then, scenes that work beautifully in a book can come across as flat and dead slow on screen.) But if you try to take the story and truly adapt it, changing it to fit the new medium – you risk losing the heart of the tale, and pissing off everyone who loved the original.

    Yet difficult as it is, people keep trying. Part of it is likely the Hollywood desire to leap on an already profitable bandwagon, but I don’t think that’s the whole story. When you love something, you want to share it with people, to show them what you see. Adaptations can be a labor of love much as anything else. And when someone does a good job, rare as it is – oh, how wonderful it can be. (more…)

    Read More...