Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts in the "From Hunger Games to The Windup Girl. Is Dystopia the new black?" Category

  • I have a lot of different responses to dystopian and apocalyptic literature… A personal response… a professional response, and I have a few ideas on the larger cultural meanings behind the rise in popularity of post-apocalyptic and dystopian fiction.

    First, from a personal level… I grew up in the cold war. I participated in duck-and-cover drills in elementary school… movies like Dr. Strangelove, The Day After and Miracle Mile spoke to me on a personal level.  I played role playing games like Gamma World and (shout out to fellow old-school-geek Junot Diaz) Aftermath!).  And I read stuff like A Canticle for Leibowitz. From this personal connection to the apocalypse, I developed a relationship to the post-apocolpytic genre’s close sibling, Dystopian Literature.

    I’m not sure, but I think one of the first “dystopian” stories I ever read was “’Repent, Harlequin!’ Said the Ticktockman” by Harlan Ellision.  It was all down hill from there, as I ingested everything from Huxley to Burgiss to Aldis to Ballard… I could go on and on. But for whatever reason, this type of fiction really spoke to me… and I ate it up. Voraciously. From Literature with a capitol L, to the new wave to cyberpunk, if it was dystopian in nature, I probably read it.

    Eventually I ended up doing this Science fiction thing for a living. When John Joseph Adams approached me with an idea about a reprint anthology – Wastelands – my first thought was… “Well, I guess that’s an okay idea… but I already HAVE all those stories. Who exactly is this anthology for?”  Then I took off my SF-Grognard hat, and put on my publisher hat and said “It’s for the vast majority of readers out there, who don’t have upwards of three thousand anthologies and single author collections in their personal library.” While wearing this publisher hat, I figured there would be a moderate amount of interest in a post-apocalyptic anthology.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • Regardless of genre, regardless of setting or time period, isn’t every fictional protagonist experiencing dystopia?

    I mean, yes, post-zombie apocalypse, post-democratic-government, post-tragic-war stories are definitely on the rise, and the hell-on-earth scenarios make for really fantastic plots. Everything is as bad as it possibly can be, and the hero/heroine has to navigate through that to achieve or get whatever it is they need to achieve or get.

    But when I think about it, every main character in every kind of book is going through his own personal dystopia, where everything is as bad as it can be. Juliet has no hope of truly being  with Romeo. The passengers of that Oceanic flight are really, really Lost.

    In my TOOTH AND NAIL, the fae are trying to re-create the Olde Way, their utopian world that was displaced by the human world. The human world isn’t quite a dystopia but if you were a faerie used to a society of perfection and happiness and bliss, it definitely is.

    What I’m trying to say is that at the heart of every work of fiction is a character facing a life that he considers to be as bad as it possibly can be. The world doesn’t need to be in literal flames around a character who has been rejected by the love of her life, or can’t get to Hollywood in time for a casting call, or doesn’t know how to pay for his mother’s medicine, or whatever. The character’s point of view and circumstances creates the urgency, creates the individual dystopia, creates the motivation to make things better, and the conflict is what stands in their way.

    Read More...
  • Dystopian literature for young adult readers is enjoying a surge in popularity these days – which, in turn, has prompted a veritable flood of newspapers and magazines articles attempting to explain why.  Some people argue it’s because today’s teens are inheriting a world plagued by problems of a global scale unknown to previous generations. A taste for dark, dystopian tales, they say, is simply a natural response to growing up amid the great disasters of our age: 9/11, Hurricane Katrina, the Indian Ocean tsunami, the Japanese and Haitian earthquakes, the BP oil spill, the melting of the polar ice caps, etcetera, etcetera.

    But other people point out that this is nothing new; every generation has its disasters and apocalyptic fears. The two of us grew up, for example, with “duck-and-cover” drills in elementary school to “prepare” us for nuclear attack…while our parents lived through childhoods shaped by the ravages and aftershocks of World War II. For as long as dystopian books have existed, generations of readers have been devouring them.

    Of all the explanations proffered for why teen readers respond so strongly to dystopian/post-apocalyptic tales, we like Scott Westerfeld’s the best. Scott, of course, is the author of the Uglies series — which are books that, along with Suzanne Collin’s The Hunger Games, deserve a large slice of credit for establishing YA Dyslit as a genre to be reckoned with. In an essay for “Dystopia Week” on the Tor.com website, Scott said:

    “Teenagers’ lives are constantly defined by rules, and in response they construct their identities through necessary confrontations with authority, large and small. Imagining a world in which those authorities must be destroyed by any means necessary [as per dystopian fiction] is one way of expanding that game. Imagining a world in which those authorities are utterly gone [as per post-apocalyptic fiction] is another.”

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • In times of fear and uncertainty, people tend to go one of two ways:  Either they retreat to comforting, pleasant distractions…
    Or else they go dark.
    Meaning they embrace the cultural anxieties of the moment, and seek out worst-case scenarios as entertainment.
    What is THE HANDMAID’S TALE but a dystopia of right-wing values run amok? Same with THE HUNGER GAMES and THE WIND UP GIRL. I’m trying to think of a comparable example of an extreme liberal dystopia, but I can’t seem to come up with any. Maybe LOGAN’S RUN?
    What is it about scary alternate realities that’s so compelling? Why do we want to be depressed? Is it pure masochism?
    Not at all – actually, exploring one’s fears is more constructive than hiding from them. There is nothing less healthy in a crisis than closing your eyes, covering your ears and humming to drown out alarming truths.
    That’s not to say we don’t all need a little uncomplicated fun to brighten the mood once in a while, but that’s different from sticking one’s head in the sand. Also it’s counterproductive:  Plastering dark thoughts with smiley-face emoticons ultimately does nothing to allay one’s worst fears. To the contrary, it causes them to fester and multiply.
    As any psychiatrist will tell you, the only relief from problems (and the only hope of solving them) lies in first acknowledging they exist.
    Dystopian stories are a means of doing this.
    Read More...
  • I am at a bit of a disadvantage here. I haven’t read any of the new dystopian novels, and I am not a particular fan of the genre. It isn’t that I don’t like ‘em when I read ‘em, but I also don’t automatically pick up any book that has a dystopia as its setting. You will forgive me, therefore, if I am more brief than usual this week.

    I looked at a few definitions of the word to try to spark an idea, and found a lot of them to be more broad than I expected. In my mind, the word doesn’t just mean ‘oppressive society,’ or ‘bad future.’ To me, dystopia is a word that can only be applied to a society that has first striven to be a utopia. It is a failed attempt at perfection, or the aftermath of that failure, and since all attempts at perfection are doomed to failure, they are unfortunately common.

    Dystopias occur whenever ideology, of whatever stripe, is held to be more important than humanity. They happen when a leader conceives of a philosophy and tries to shape the world and its people to it no matter the cost. They happen when pragmatism and common sense are considered evils and human weakness is an unforgivable crime.

    To me dystopias are not really the stuff of science fiction or fantasy, since there have been and continue to be so many examples of them in the real world. Indeed, though the books that feature them may take place in the future or in an imagined world, like the works of Jonathan Swift they should more be considered satire or allegory, since they do not actually speculate on some possible world, but rather comment on the one around us.

    Read More...
  • Before I launch into today’s topic I want to make sure we’re clear in our definitions. Dystopia is (according to wikipedia) “–is the idea of a society in a repressive and controlled state, often under the guise of being utopian, as characterized in books like Brave New WorldNineteen Eighty-Four, and more recently, The Hunger Games. Dystopian societies feature different kinds of repressive social control systems, various forms of active and passive coercion.” This is not the same thing as post-apocalyptic fiction. In post-apocalyptic fiction, society falls apart and chaos reigns. One is about oppression. The other is about chaos. Yes, there are stories and novels which combine the two and blur the definitions — nothing wrong with that, but I feel it’s very important to remember the actual meaning behind the words. Why? Because dystopian fiction is a tool used by the left to criticize the right. While post-apocalyptic fiction is generally used by the right to criticize the left. They’re two very distinct points of veiw. I believe in checks and balances. We *need* both points of view. Neither should be totally in charge. As one of my favorite dystopian writers, George Orwell, said, “Absolute power corrupts absolutely.”

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • There’s this short story by Grace Paley where a woman is visiting her father on his deathbed. He has cancer, and he is dying. She’s trying to tell him that not everything is so awful in her life, that there is always hope. To respond to her, he turns up the dial on the machines that are gently aiding him into the dark.

    There comes a point in time where everything is darkness. Once the diagnosis happens, there’s no going back. Society is no different. We will reach a point of diagnosis. There will be no going back. We can hope all we want, vote, protest, make war or make peace. The fundamental rules that we have all believed in until now will no longer work.

    Writing is like that. You keep working hard on the hope that someday you will get enough of an audience, build enough of a back catalog of books, that you can have a career at it, reading and writing and editing anthologies. But, the means that built that livelihood for so many people was a system of distributors and publishers that no longer exists. Still, we toil on, struggling to reach that next milestone, and struggling to figure out the new technologies that have come to despoil us all. If dystopia is the latest hot topic of the literatures, it is probably because it speaks to the people writing and publishing stories who are living in one. The starving artist is a cliche for a reason. The struggling small press is almost as cliche. The failing bookstore, whose soulful love of books and customers is not enough to stem the tide of soulless corporate interests, has been cliche for twenty years.

    So if we’re writing dystopias, if we’re buying them, it might be because we live in one.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • If it feels like our SF is trending toward dystopia, there’s a reason for that: we live in one already. Or rather, any chronicle of the future has to start with where we are in the present, which involves global warming, economic turbulence, peak oil, and all the stuff that’s so likely to feature in the dismal futures that writers are so fond of creating. Perhaps the fact that we’re already in that world is why SF has been losing market share to fantasy….the former no longer offers much in the way of escape.

    Then again, dystopia’s a relative concept. Depending on where you are in the society–or even on your point of view–one person’s dystopia can be another person’s golden age. After all, William Gibson has said he’d move to the Sprawl like a shot, dystopia or not. (Though he said that in the 80s, before so much of that tech actually came true. Maybe nowadays he wouldn’t even need to leave Vancouver.) Dystopia is thus a way of simplification, a way to paint something black that’s actually multi-hued, or at least multi-faceted. How much urban SF in the 70s was influenced by the decay of New York City?…decay that ultimately the city bounced back from (Detroit being a different story). Clockwork Orange saw a future of lawless gangs running wild across crumbling urban infrastructure….yet much of that infrastructure is still a going concern.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • Dystopian fiction is a time-honored tradition in genre. Beginning with HG Wells and continuing with Huxley, Orwell, Bradbury, Vonnegut, Atwood, and right into the present day with Bacigalupi and Collins, dystopias fascinate and frighten us with what is possible in human society. A well-established subgenre of speculative fiction, they pop up on our bookshelves every few years to bring forth a new set of ‘what if’ questions.

    Dystopias provide a view into the maximum extensions of political, religious and other motivating beliefs. While in real-life societies rarely reach that logical end point of an argument (and when they do, it is always ugly and strictly not encouraged by me), fiction can do it again and again. What if we lived in a theocracy that followed the exact word of the Bible? What if we lived in a society in which the government controlled every aspect of our lives? What if women were denied agency over their own lives and forced to reproduce for strangers? A dystopian novel can take those questions and build them into a world we can examine, discuss, and question. (more…)

    Read More...
  • Dystopia is a fine word, concentrated and resonant, for society gone wrong. We like to think that complexity (of politics, economics, technology, religion, demographics) means there are now more ways than ever in which society can go wrong. But that was also the perception in the past – in the the eighteenth century (Swift, Hogarth), the nineteenth (Dickens, Dostoevsky, Zola), and the early twentieth (Fritz Lang, Brecht, Orwell, Kafka, Huxley). Dystopia has always been a literary theme and a philosophical perception, but it didn’t always have such a good label.

    This is absolutely not to demean current dystopias: novels by Gibson, Bacigalupi and others are wonderful on their own merits, but they’re in a line of descent from past literature.

    I notice from my previous posts a rather anal-retentive tendency to do lists of books. It’s tempting to do the same here, because the literature of past centuries does dystopia very well, not by being aware of the word but by being aware of the condition. But maybe a single example will do: Bleak House. What could be more dystopian than the opening pages, with the symbolic fog swirling through the mouldering Chancery buildings? And through the mouldering people? What could be more dystopian than the Jarndyce litigation, where generations grow and die in the shadow of a legal case of almost geological slowness and impenetrability?

    (more…)

    Read More...