Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts Tagged "John Love"

  •  

     When I finished writing my novel FAITH, I experienced what I thought was a strange reaction: I closed the file on it and didn’t want any more to do with it. This isn’t to say I reacted against it. I felt proud of it, and still do, and I reckon I’ve written it as well as I’m able to. It was simply that I felt I’d said everything I wanted to say about those people and that universe, and any more would be mere tinkering. At least, that’s how my agent explained it when I described it to him, and he said it’s not uncommon for authors to have such a feeling. Do any of the other Night Bazaar authors recognise it?

    When Lord Chesterfield said that a novel must be exceptionally good to live as long as the average cat, he probably had a life of eleven or twelve years in mind. Our house has always had cats, and most of them have lived that long or more. Our longest-lived cat was Chloe: twenty-seven years. She was a small skinny cat, with lovely tortoiseshell markings, and something of the sinewy build of a Siamese. She simply wasn’t afraid of anything. She’d have faced down a pack of velociraptors if they’d come into our garden (admittedly not a frequent occurrence in the English Home Counties) and she went through life like a sort of feline bag lady, swearing copiously at anything that invaded her space. I’d like to think that my book will be out there in twenty-seven years, conducting itself like Chloe.

    I’ve enjoyed doing internet interviews about FAITH. One of the questions was to describe the book in 140 characters or less. The answer I gave was:

    “Motiveless, invincible alien ship. Almost-alien human opponent. Moby Dick meets Kafka meets Duel. Irresistible force meets irresistible force.”

    I’d love to see someone reading my book on a train, or browsing it in a bookshop. We British tend not to speak to each other unless we’re introduced, but I’d find it hard not to start a conversation.

     

    I’m writing my second novel now; I’m nearly halfway through it. It’s also SF, but very different, and deliberately so. It will be a kind of political thriller, but with strange edges. I’ve set it in the future (about fifty years from now) so I could explore ideas about how politics, economics, technology, culture and religion might develop by then. And that’s why I love the SF genre. Whenever I get an idea for a book, I turn almost automatically to SF as the genre in which to express it. SF gives the freedom to explore and develop ideas. It’s not impossible in other genres, but it’s more possible in SF. At least, that’s how I’ve always felt about the genre, but again, I’d like to ask the other Night Bazaar authors if they feel the same way.

    Another question I’ve been asked in interviews is whether I’ve thought of doing a sequel or prequel to FAITH, or at least a book set in the same universe. Again, I’d like to know what the other Night Bazaar authors think about sequels or prequels. Personally I’m not enthusiastic, for the reasons mentioned above.

    I think this will be the last of my scheduled Night Bazaar posts. I’ll always remember that my first one was on January 3, the day FAITH was published. I’ve really enjoyed doing this, and getting to know the other Night Bazaar authors, and finding how many things we have in common. I hope to get over to some conventions in future, and perhaps we can meet up and talk about favourite authors, music, and whether the Ultimate Answer really is Forty-Two. Very best wishes for the success of your books.

    W.G., once again I’m sorry about what happened to you and I hope you get your home back to normal.

    Read More...
  • I had a long and interesting career in the music industry, but not as a performer. My love of music is equalled only by my inability to perform it or compose it. In the absence of those abilities I ran PPL, the world’s largest record industry copyright organisation, and worked for performers and record companies by doing rights negotiations and fighting legal cases.

    To quote Elvis Presley (US Male), I said all that to say all this: because of where I spent most of my working life, the word Punk has a particular resonance for me. Perhaps more than the suffix -Punk. As a movement which shook the pomposity out of popular music, Punk has a huge resonance. As a suffix appended to other words it has – for me, at least – rather less. It denotes various kinds of sub-genres which have produced novels and novelists I admire hugely, but none of those sub-genres has shaken the whole of SF in quite the way Punk shook the whole of popular music.

    Chas Chandler, of the great sixties group The Animals, was an early advocate of Jimi Hendrix (John The Baptist heralding Jesus? I always found that comparison irresistible, if tasteless). I went to the first Jimi Hendrix Experience concert in Britain, at the Marquee in London in 1967. When I heard and saw what he did with a guitar, I might have used the expression Shock of the New – except that it didn’t appear until the 1980s, when it was used to describe the advent of modern art, but with hindsight it fits.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  •  

    I must apologise in advance for what will be a short and rather unhelpful post. It could hardly be anything else, as I’ve never been to any SF conventions. I’ve been a compulsive SF reader for almost as long as I’ve been able to read, but I suppose I’ve been rather like a lurker, consuming the medium but not actively socialising. I hope that will change now I’ve had a novel published, but it’s only one novel and it was only published in January, so the occasion hasn’t arisen yet.

     

    I do know that at some SF conventions, people might appear dressed as their favourite SF characters. If my novel ever gets famous enough for people to appear as characters from it, then I’d pay good money to see the people dressed as Cyr. If you’ve read my book, you will understand that. If you haven’t, please buy it and read it. It’s called FAITH, and my website is http://john-love.com/

    Read More...
  •  

    As an SF writer and reader I’m naturally well-disposed towards the idea of alien craft. I’d like to think that some UFO stories may have a basis in fact, though I’m very sceptical: most of them, I’m sure, are either hoaxes or genuine mistakes. For those which aren’t, there’s another explanation which is just as thought-provoking: that some UFO sightings are actually sightings of advanced prototypes of human origin.

    The test flights of the B-2 Stealth bomber prototype were probably the cause of a flurry of sightings in the 1980s of a huge black boomerang-shaped UFO.  People sighting it described its shape accurately but said it was much larger and faster than the real thing. Was that just natural adrenalin-fuelled exaggeration, or is there a bigger, faster B-2? Either way, people designed and built it, which is almost as interesting as aliens – and much more interesting than weather balloons or lenticular clouds.

    There’s another plane which, like the B-2, looks like no other flying machine: the SR-71 Blackbird. It can fly at speeds and heights which make it practically a spaceship, and yet it’s now an old design – over fifty years old. It still looks as far in advance of current planes as it originally looked in the early 1960s, and yet it was retired because there’s something which outperforms it. Its replacement, codenamed Aurora, is in turn the subject of many rumours and UFO sightings. It’s very difficult to imagine what something designed and built fifty years after the Blackbird – which itself looked fifty years ahead of its time -  can do, but it must be quite diverting.

    And I haven’t yet mentioned any really modern planes, or drones. That, especially the growth of drones, leads somewhere else entirely.

    The Air Show at Biggin Hill in Kent is one of the world’s biggest. I live nearby and I go most years. I remember a few years ago seeing the Eurofighter prototype (now in service as the Typhoon) demonstrating its computer-controlled (fly-by-wire) abilities. At times it was almost flying sideways, and changing direction almost at right-angles. America has several advanced planes of at least equal capability. I thought, then, that this must be the last generation of manned high-performance planes, because no humans (and probably only a few aliens) could survive the G-forces generated by their performance.

    Which is where drones will come in. Without a resident human,  they don’t have to be as big and their speed and manoeuvring capabilities can be even more extreme. It makes perfect sense, too, to avoid risking an expensively-trained pilot in actual combat when he or she can pilot it remotely.

    I wrote “he or she” because I tried to avoid the male pronoun; and drones, among all the other less savoury things they do, might help gender equality. It used to be said that women are less likely to pilot the highest-performing aircraft for the same reason that they’re less likely to be Formula 1 drivers – not because their abilities are any less but because they’re less physically resistant to G-forces. I’m merely reporting the view, not endorsing it (so please don’t shoot the messenger) but whether it was ever true or not, it will be irrelevant with the advent of more remotely-piloted drones.

    But it doesn’t end there.

    In the National Maritime Museum at Greenwich on the Thames (also not far from where I live) there’s a robot device with impressive-looking grapples and lasers and pincers and other attachments which is used for underwater repairs to oil-rigs. On the face of it, nothing unusual: the obvious kind of vehicle for remotely-controlled operation. Except that it isn’t remotely-controlled any more. It’s completely autonomous and self-directing. It’s been programmed with all the accumulated experience of years of remotely-controlled repair operations, and now it knows what to look for and what to do when it finds it, and is left to itself. An ideal employee, unsalaried and untiring and uncomplaining, provided it doesn’t read I, Robot and start getting antsy.

    The next generation of drones (in fact, some prototypes already flying) will have a similar but vastly more advanced self-programming and self-directing capacity. They’ll go out and decide themselves how to conduct offensive missions. Skynet has almost arrived.

    The old SF “sense of wonder” often expressed itself in phrases like “the future is already here.” But the future isn’t only what is being developed, but how fast it’s developing: exponentially. Not only is the future here, it’s come and gone. The future’s future is here now.

    From all of the above, you’ll have gathered that I’m far more interested in military aviation than civil aviation. Not that I’m particularly warlike, but the designs of military planes are quite beautiful and ingenious if you forget what they’re there to do. Military aircraft designs are by definition cutting-edge.

    And civil aircraft designs are boring. They have to be, because they carry civilians. The designs have to be conventional and tried and tested. Everything is too litigious and risk-averse for the sudden advent of cutting-edge designs in civil aviation. But it’s a shame that cutting-edge designs aren’t at least being tested now, because they could produce some social and environmental gains. Blended-wing designs (rather than the current cigar-case-with-wings-attached shape) would provide vastly improved interior space and lift, so the same number of passengers could be moved by fewer planes using less fuel. Short/vertical takeoff and landing would dispense with runways almost entirely, so airports would no longer have to be huge neighbourhood-eating monsters. (Of course, modern high-speed trains could do the same, but that’s fortunately outside the scope of this already overlong post.)

    I was going to go on (and on, and on) from here to talk about spaceships and military hardware in SF, but I want to leave a space at the end to talk about a favourite old plane of mine, so I’ll skip over this section very briefly. I haven’t mentioned my novel FAITH since my first “Introductions” post on January 3, when it was published. There are a lot of spaceships in FAITH, two in particular which are the main opponents in the confrontation which takes up most of the book. I wanted them to have abilities as advanced (and strange) as the book’s far-future setting allowed. There were plenty of spectacular sources of inspiration -Iain M Banks, Star Wars, Star Trek, Alien. And Douglas Adams, whose Vogon spaceship hung in the air in exactly the way a brick didn’t. But they all had a huge scale to them. I wanted the Charles Manson and its opponent, Faith, to be on a more imaginable scale, even if they did unimaginable things.

    So, this last bit is pure self-indulgence, because I want to mention my favourite plane, and what made it extraordinary. It’s a plane from World War Two, the De Havilland Mosquito. Its design was as advanced, as far ahead of anything else, in 1940 as the Blackbird was in 1960 or the Aurora is now. Why it was so advanced is that it was made out of plywood.

    At least, the airframe was made out of plywood rather than metal. But not ordinary plywood. The Mosquito’s particular plywood was laminated to give enormous strength and rigidity and lightness. (Plywood, Jim, but not as we know it.) The Mosquito was a medium-sized plane, with two Spitfire engines but weighing less than two Spitfires, so that for years it was officially the world’s fastest plane even though it was originally designed as a bomber rather than a fighter. In fact, it became one of the first multi-role combat planes. Britain built over seven thousand of them, and there were fighter and reconnaisance and ground-attack variations. Because most of it was wood and not metal, it helped the war effort. And, most divertingly, if a Mosquito came back with a damaged wing or tailplane, the Royal Air Force could get a local carpenter or cabinet-maker or coffin-maker to build a new bit and glue it back on. A wonderful plane, and also a beautiful and very ingenious one.

    Read More...
  • “Sex and feelings…the elements of Romance.” I’ve decided this must mean the depiction of a full relationship: not just opportunistic, up-against-the-wall sex, but a relationship involving sex and love which reaches across divides. The divides could be physical, biological, cultural, religious, or political. And, SFF being what it is, those divides will be more numerous and varied than in other genres.

    Romance, as defined, has blossomed in the recent vampire-centred novels and TV series and movies. I don’t know them well enough to give any detailed view, but their theme – the vampires’ isolation and alienness, their love for people who they’ll see grow old and die – was explored before in the movieThe Hunger (with Catherine Deneuve and David Bowie) and in the novel and movie Interview With the Vampire. Also in the Gary Oldman movie Dracula, which had the byline Love Never Dies. They explored it very movingly. I’ve always thought The Hunger was very underrated.

    I know vampires aren’t strictly SFF, which is what this topic asks about, but they are close relatives of the genre. I’m reluctant to dig up (perhaps an appropriate phrase) the old arguments about genre, but what fascinates me is their genuine intention to focus on Romance as interpreted above. In fact, it’s arguably their main focus.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • I feel like I’m full of soup. Possibly also something else beginning with S, but definitely soup. It sloshes around inside me when I walk. It’s made up of bits of  everything I am. All the memories and relationships, all the music and reading and experiences and obsessions and loves and hates and hopes, that I’ve known. Then, like the arm of a jukebox when a coin is inserted, something reaches down into that soup and plucks out a combination of bits to make a book. Is the combination random or deliberate? And is the coin Inspiration? And is this becoming a clumsy mixed metaphor or what?

    I don’t know where it comes from, or if Inspiration is too grand a word for it, but I do know it when it comes. I can clearly remember the day when the arm of the jukebox reached down and pulled out the combination of bits that became the premise of my first novel, FAITH.

    There were some books and films which I’d carried in my head for years and which obviously supplied some of FAITH’s building-blocks: Moby Dick, Kafka’s The Trial, Duel. There was a particular day when all of that, and several other things, combined and recombined and gave me the premise of a novel: the meeting of two apparently invincible opponents. Of two ships, one of human origin and one unknown, locked together in a battle that almost tears space-time around them. This wasn’t the first time a possible premise for a book had flitted through my mind, but it was the first time I absolutely knew it was viable. Almost before I’d finished thinking of the premise I was plotting the details.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • Dystopia is a fine word, concentrated and resonant, for society gone wrong. We like to think that complexity (of politics, economics, technology, religion, demographics) means there are now more ways than ever in which society can go wrong. But that was also the perception in the past – in the the eighteenth century (Swift, Hogarth), the nineteenth (Dickens, Dostoevsky, Zola), and the early twentieth (Fritz Lang, Brecht, Orwell, Kafka, Huxley). Dystopia has always been a literary theme and a philosophical perception, but it didn’t always have such a good label.

    This is absolutely not to demean current dystopias: novels by Gibson, Bacigalupi and others are wonderful on their own merits, but they’re in a line of descent from past literature.

    I notice from my previous posts a rather anal-retentive tendency to do lists of books. It’s tempting to do the same here, because the literature of past centuries does dystopia very well, not by being aware of the word but by being aware of the condition. But maybe a single example will do: Bleak House. What could be more dystopian than the opening pages, with the symbolic fog swirling through the mouldering Chancery buildings? And through the mouldering people? What could be more dystopian than the Jarndyce litigation, where generations grow and die in the shadow of a legal case of almost geological slowness and impenetrability?

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • Stanley Kubrick, when he’d decided to film Thackeray’s novel Barry Lyndon, spent some time researching eighteenth-century costumes. Then he went to all the major film and theatrical costumiers, but was unsatisfied with what they offered him. His research had shown him that eighteenth-century ladies’ gowns were stitched in a particular way which wasn’t reproduced by modern costumiers. Only with the authentic eighteenth-century stitching, he concluded, could the gowns be made to hang authentically. So he ignored the costumiers, and had the  ladies’ gowns for Barry Lyndon made to his own specification.

    Eighteenth-century Europe was almost as alien as an SFF setting. (The past is another country.) Kubrick’s film depicted it more accurately than probably any other film has done, because he insisted on getting the detail right. I believe the most important single thing, when creating any setting, is the quality of the detail. Of the small components.

    (more…)

    Read More...
  • Apologies in advance for what will be a short post. I really don’t have much to contribute to this thread, simply because I’ve only had one thing commercially published – my novel FAITH, published on January 3, the date of my first Night Bazaar post – and so I’ve only had one set of dealings with one editor, Jeremy Lassen. It was unexpectedly painless, but more of that later.

    Going back a stage, I should mention the edits suggested by my agent, Jason Yarn of Paradigm. They were very perceptive, and tightened the book while leaving most of it intact. Maybe Jason’s feel for what FAITH was about explains my (so far) only interaction with an editor.

    Jason had always been at pains to warn me about the editorial battles I’d have when (he always said When, not If) a publisher took my book. The edits a publisher would demand, he said, would make his edits look like the mere dabbings of a powder-puff. I was conscious that FAITH was already of more-than-average length, and that I was a totally unknown debut novelist. So when Nightshade came in, I mentally girded my loins and made ready to hear something like the remark used above as the title of this post (it’s attributed to Ambrose Bierce).

    And then the unexpected happened. I got a short note from Jeremy Lassen, via Jason. It began “Not much to cut here”, and went on to outline, in only two or three paragraphs, suggestions for enhancing the book in some very specific ways. His Editorial Letter, when I finally got it after a period of some anxiety, did no more and no less than his original note had said it would. Some of his suggestions actually involved additions, not deletions. All of them made perfect sense. The net effect was that FAITH was only about 500 words shorter.

    I’ve already thanked Jason and Jeremy privately, and I’m glad to repeat it publicly.

    Read More...
  • Not only the plot device of the innocent abroad. John Bunyan was inspired to write Pilgrim’s Progress after reading The Plain Man’s Pathway To Heaven – written by Arthur Dent.

    Hitchhiker’s Guide is one of my genre favourites, in all its early forms: the original BBC Radio 4 programme, the equally original BBC TV adaptation, and Douglas Adams’ unequalled “Trilogy of Five Novels.” But not the Hollywood movie. I didn’t like that at all.

    Within the genre, some other favourites are:

    Alfred Bester: but only his novels and stories from the fifties.

    Ursula LeGuin: almost anything.

    Jack Vance: the Demon Princes novels especially (most of his others too, but sometimes he goes on autopilot).

    Iain M Banks: almost anything.

    China Mieville: Perdido Street Station especially, but most of his other stuff.

    Brian Aldiss: Hothouse and the Helliconia trilogy especially, but most of his other stuff.

    William Gibson: especially Neuromancer, also The Difference Engine and the Bridge trilogy.

    Fritz Leiber: most of his stuff.

    Frederik Pohl: The Heechee trilogy, and (with Cyril Kornbluth) The Space Merchants.

    R A Lafferty: especially Past Master.

    Arkady and Boris Strugatsky: almost anything.

    Stanislav Lem: known mainly for Solaris, but his output covered a huge range. For example, Imaginary Magnitude and A Perfect Vacuum (reviews of, and forewords to, nonexistent future books), the Pirx the Pilot and Ijon Tichy stories (surreal but perfectly logical political satires), and The Invincible (page-turning hard SF).

    Non-genre favourites include:

    Giant nineteenth-century novels, especially those from England, Russia and France. Crime and Punishment , in particular. It works equally well as a great piece of literature (about Life, The Universe And Everything), and as a whodunnit. Except that the person who dunnit is known at the outset and has a cat-and-mouse game with the equally clever examining magistrate, wanting both escape and capture.

    Jane Austen: How did she do it? No sex or violence, mostly just people having tea, but totally unputdownable.

    Metaphysical poets: neutron-star language: ultimate concentration and economy.

    World War 1 poets, especially Wilfred Owen.

    James Joyce, especially Portrait of the Artist and Ulysses.

    Doctor Johnson, or more precisely Boswell’s Life of Samuel Johnson. Johnson was a great bear of a man, a pompous High Tory and High Church figure with opinions on everything – always original and sometimes unexpected, like his opposition to slavery. And he liked cats.

    Herman Melville: Moby Dick of course, but also Billy Budd and Bartleby The Scrivener.

    Richmal Crompton’s William books: children’s books mostly set in the nineteen-thirties and forties. Great children’s books, because Richmal Crompton used unashamedly literary words whose meaning you could figure out by their context. A good way to learn and remember words. Her style was dry and ironic, with absolutely no talking down.

    Shakespeare, for all the obvious reasons, and also some of his contemporaries: Ben Jonson, Christopher Marlowe.

    Chaucer, for his characterisation.

    Cormac McCarthy: everything of his that I’ve read so far.

    Flann O’Brien: The Third Policeman (like Gormenghast, it defies genres).

    Any books which manage to be both literary works and page-turners: too many for an exhaustive list, but titles like David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas, William Boyd’s Brazzaville Beach, Thomas Wolfe’s Bonfire of the Vanities, Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Remains of the Day. The book I’m currently reading is that kind of book: The Shadow of the Wind, by Carlos Ruiz Zafon. I’m alternating it with The Windup Girl. I like alternating reads: each one seems to gain by the contrast.

    Read More...