Stay Updated: Posts | Comments

Posts Tagged "The Straits of Galahesh"

  • Bradley P. Beaulieu

    I was one of the inaugural members of the Night Bazaar, and during that first year we talked about villains, and an interesting thing came up in the comments. I’d talked about favoring the heroes and villains should be both be gray, and Doug Hulick, of Among Thieves fame, countered my post by saying (essentially) that sometimes it’s ok to have black and white villains and heroes. I’ll admit. I was pretty ensconced in my viewpoint, but I do try to step outside of my preconceptions when someone takes a view that opposes mine. So I noodled it for a bit. I thought about it. And, well, while I understood where Doug was coming from, I still didn’t think that sort of story was for me. And in fact, I’ll admit it, I kind of looked down on that type of story as simplistic. Literary popcorn.

    But, as the mind tends to do, now and again my hindbrain would bring the subject up, especially when I thought about my basic approach to writing. I kept going back to an observation my agent passed on to me after he’d read my first book, The Winds of Khalakovo. He said that in general (there are always exceptions) stories with fairly easy to comprehend villains do better in the marketplace. At the time, I scoffed, not at my agent, but at shortsighted readers. I’m part of the gray crowd, I told myself. I’m a disciple of Glen Cook and George R.R. Martin.

    But as I thought about this more and more, I started to see the value in making the villain more black and the hero more white. I think the biggest benefit of such an approach relates to how deeply the reader roots for the heroes and heroines. Said another way, it’s about the level of investment on the part of the reader, how emotional they become over the fate of the characters. Part of this equation is the level to which they sympathize with the heroes. (more…)

    Read More...
  • Bradley P. Beaulieu

    I like antiheroes.

    Why do I like antihoeroes?

    Well, because they challenge my expectations. I grew up reading heroes and heroines that fell into a pretty nifty heroic box. It starts with fairy tales, of course, but moves on to guys like, well, Bilbo and Frodo. Natch. And Sturm Brightblade and King Aurthur and Rand al’Thor and Luke Skywalker.

    But damned if they aren’t boring after a while. It’s not Luke we like, is it? It’s Han. It’s not Sturm, but Raistlin. Why? Because there was something about those characters. In Raistlin we knew early on that that was something not quite right about him. He didn’t act like Gandalf at all, did he? He had his own agenda and his own methods. And yet he wasn’t all bad. He certainly had a soft spot for his brother, Caramon. But at the same time he was singularly focused on his goals, and at times he did some pretty nasty things to get there. And in Han’s case… Well, there’s something about the rogue, isn’t there?

    Corwin of Amber was an interesting study. Here was a guy who woke up with amnesia and had to piece together his past before his family managed to kill him. His quest wasn’t terribly heroic, at least in the beginning, and we saw him acting pretty ruthlessly to (a) stay alive and (b) figure out why someone was trying to kill him. That it was his family that was after him made it all the more interesting. Corwin wasn’t a bad guy, but neither did he evoke the typical traits of the hero. (more…)

    Read More...
  • Bradley P. Beaulieu

    Do I experience envy? Um, need you ask? Of course I experience envy. And that isn’t necessarily a bad thing.

    First of all, for me, it’s inevitable. Most wouldn’t know it from talking to me, but I’m very competitive. Strangely enough, this may stem from not playing enough organized sports when I was a kid. I played, you know, neighborhood stuff, and in school gym class and such, but not much beyond that. I did, however, get a high from getting good scores on tests. I wasn’t a die-hard when it came to studying, but man I loved getting A’s.

    That translated to my adult life, not so much in my career in software programming, where things are hard to measure, but certainly here in the writing world, where it seems things are all about measuring. At least they are nowadays. Back before Bookscan, who knew what other writers’ numbers were like? You were lucky to get royalty statements that made a lick of sense for your own books, much less someone else’s. But now? Well, you hear about sales being made. You know, the Publishers Weekly nice deals, very nice deals, major deals, and so on. And now you can see (in stark relief) such things as Amazon rankings and number of reviews on any number of sites. You can look at their Facebook followers, Twitter followers, Google+, Pinterest, and on and on and on.

    It’s numbing to the point that if you allow yourself to fall into the pit of envy, you may never come out again. That’s one of the things I had to be careful about early on. I’m a numbers guy. I wanted to know how well my books were (or weren’t) doing. So I would compare and analyze and try to rank myself in some way. In the end, it’s is a pretty useless exercise. It fed my “want to know now” urges, but little else. It was without substance, like trying to fill yourself up on lettuce alone.

    And yet I began this post by saying that envy isn’t necessarily a bad thing. If you experience envy, I think it’s important to channel that into something else, and for me, it’s trying to make my work better. But let me first differentiate between a couple kinds of envy. The first (and most self-possessed) is the kind in which you look at someone’s success and it feels (to you, anyway) unwarranted. Maybe you don’t like the person. Maybe you don’t respect their work. Maybe you feel like they’ve jumped the line. It’s very much like the feeling I get when I see a movie franchise like the Transformers succeed the way it has when movies like (picking a recent favorite out of my hat) Melancholia hardly got any play at all. There’s no use in paying attention to this sort of envy. In fact, it’s counterproductive. It saps energy, and it takes your eye off the prize. (more…)

    Read More...
  • I don’t really remember the exact moment I decided I wanted to start writing—I came to it late and played with the idea off an on during college and through the early part of my professional career as a software programmer—but I do remember the moment that fantasy first fascinated me. It was in third grade. My best friend had read The Hobbit, and had recommended I read it too. So i did. And I loved it. I adored it. It was my first exposure to fantasy, and I remember how transfixed I was, not merely by the story, but also the maps and the covers.

    The covers, if I’m recalling correctly, were these ones:

    The world, as anyone who’s read them will tell you, is so wide and deep it’s easy to fall into. I loved the fairy tale feel of The Hobbit and the deeper, more dangerous feel of The Lord of the Rings. I even liked (not loved, it took me three tries and nearly a decade to finish it) the feeling of myth that The Silmarillion gave.

    So when I started making up my mind that I actually wanted to write, I knew it would be fantasy. But the point of this week’s posts isn’t so much the origin of our writing and why we write it, but why we enjoy fantasy in particular. What it brings to the table.

    I enjoy writing science fiction, but I have to admit, I find it too similar to our modern day world at this point. There was certainly a time when science fiction was little different from fantasy; it was just that one looked backward and one looked forward. Today those paradigms have been broken over and over again, and science fiction has stayed ahead of the technology curve, but it’s getting harder and harder to do so.

    But for me, that’s only part of the problem. I enjoy looking back to another time. I enjoy the escapism of fantasy. But first and foremost, I find compelling because of the particular brand of agency it grants the characters (and so, to the reader). It gives a sense of power that we’ll never have in real life. And so, from this perspective, it’s fun to write about kings and queens; it’s fun to write about thieves and wizards; because in them we get to experience wondrous things, things we dreamed about as children. I think that’s why the buying market has trended away from science fiction and more toward fantasy. Readers are looking for the same things in fantasy that make me want to write it.

    So while I enjoy science fiction enough to dabble, I doubt that I’ll ever write a science fiction novel. Fantasy’s what I love, and that’s where I’ll stay.

    Read More...
  • Bradley P. Beaulieu

    I do indeed write largely alone. That hasn’t always been the case, though. It used to be, when I was first starting out, that I wanted lots of feedback. Lots. When I was active on the Online Writing Workshop, I would post each chapter of the novels I was working on practically as soon as I finished writing them. It was a quick way for me to gain feedback, and I learned pretty quickly how much negative feedback stung, and continued to sting. I started pulling back a bit. I would work harder on the chapters, both while I was writing (using the lessons I was starting to learn) and during editing.

    Slowly, the feedback became less negative, more positive. This gave me more confidence. I continued with that type of workshop—online trading of crits—but I started to feel like it was helping me less and less. This is no knock against those in the workshop. It’s just a natural progression. Eventually you’ll grow. You’ll move on. You’ll find new critting partners that bring something new to the table, and hopefully you’ll do the same for them.

    During this time (my early, pre-published apprenticeship), I would actively trade full novel crits as well. That’s always a great thing to do, both reading others’ works critically, and getting yours read. It helps you to see the larger arcs and the problems that can crop up in trying to present them dramatically.

    Over the next 4 years, I attended several intense writing workshops. Viable Paradise, Writers of the Future, Orson Scott Card’s Literary Bootcamp, and finally Clarion back in 2006. Once I’d finished with those, I wasn’t burnt out, but I needed some time away from such things. I no longer actively critiqued online. I didn’t have any local workshops. I really only critiqued with a few close friends. This was the point at which I knew I was getting close. I was selling short fiction pretty regularly. And I felt if I could just find a good enough idea for a novel, it would put me over the top. At least, that’s what I hoped. There’s still so much luck involved, getting the right project into the right person’s hands at the right time. (more…)

    Read More...
  • Bradley P. Beaulieu

    Hi all. My name is Bradley P. Beaulieu (Brad), and I was one of the charter members of the Night Bazaar before it was subsumed by Night Shade Books. I’m terribly pleased to have been asked back to chat more with all of you, in part because of what being invited back means.

    And what does it mean? Well, I’m glad you asked. It means that I have a book coming out with Night Shade. Again. My debut novel, The Winds of Khalakovo, came out last April, and its sequel, The Straits of Galahesh, came out… When was it again?

    Oh, yeah. Yesterday!

    I thought, to re-introduce myself, I’d share a bit about how and why I got into writing fantasy, and who some of my influences were. I’ve been reading fantasy practically since I learned how to read. I came across The Hobbit in third grade—I even remember the friend that turned me onto it: Jim Vogt, my best friend at the time—and I’ve never looked back. It was a wondrous experience, walking through Middle Earth with Bilbo and Gandalf and the dwarves. I sometimes wonder what it would have been like had I found another seminal work in a different genre. Would I now be a mystery writer had I read Sherlock Holmes or Sexton Blake when I was young? Would I write spy thrillers if I had somehow stumbled across James Bond? I like to think the answer is no. Fantasy feels like a part of me at this point, so strong was my reaction to The Hobbit and, later, The Lord of the Rings and The Silmarillion. I can’t imagine a world that feels more internally consistent, more whole, than those volumes.

    And I think this is what eventually drove me to be a writer. As I matured I started to read other things, things like Piers Anthony’s Split Infinity Series, Stephen R. Donaldson’s The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant, Terry Brooks’ Shannara Series, Thieves’ World from Lynn Abbey, and Michael Moorcock’s Elric of Melniboné. While I enjoyed these and many other books to varying degrees, none of them quite had that sense of history, of scope, that Tolkien had created in his stories. So as I started to dabble in writing in college, while I didn’t realize this consciously at the time, I was trying to recreate that sense of wonder that I’d found while traveling toward the Lonely Mountain to steal into the lair of Smaug. (more…)

    Read More...
  • I know this post is supposed to be about the year in review, but I think it’s very much about looking forward as well.

    One thing this year has taught me is that “I can do it again,” meaning I know how to write a novel more than once. The Winds of Khalakovo came out this year, but I turned in Book 2, The Straits of Galahesh, a few months back, and I’m well on my way to completing the first draft of Book 3. So I’ve gained a sense of confidence that I can do this at a high level. And this is important. Ever since I’ve started writing novels and short stories, it’s always felt like I won’t be able to do it again. Like “this time” was a fluke, and the “next time” the story’s going to fall flat on its face. Never is this feeling more apparent to me than in the first third of writing a new book. I’d written three books before Winds was picked up by Night Shade, so I’m essentially writing my sixth book now. And damned if the same feelings don’t crop up again and again, even on Book 3. But now that I’ve gotten some good feedback from my editor and my beta readers on Straits, I’m more confident that it, and my writing, are doing fine.

    So in some ways, this is a transitional period for me. I have the first year of publication under my belt. I’ve learned a lot in the past year, not just in how to write, but how to promote, how to balance my time, and deal with the pressures of publication. In other words: I’ve learned how to be a professional writer. A young pro writer, mind you, but a pro nonetheless.

    The second thing I’ve learned is that I really, really like this business. It pays chump change a lot of the time, and there are a lot of things that are a pain to deal with, but the act of creating something from scratch and sharing it—which assumes, of course, that people are reading your stuff—is really gratifying. And it’s enjoyable to be around so many other creative people. It’s why I’ve gone to conventions and such in the past, but more doors have been opened for me this year, and I’ve come to enjoy those new interactions—with my publisher, reviewers, bloggers, and other authors. (more…)

    Read More...
  • Bradley P. Beaulieu has new cover art!  Todd Lockwood recently turned in the art for the second book in Brad’s Lays of Anuskaya trilogy, The Straits of Galahesh, and the results are gorgeous. You can read more about it and view the artwork on Brad’s blog.

    Courtney Schafer‘s novel The Whitefire Crossing received a great review over at Adventures Fantastic – click here to read (though beware a few spoilers!).  Courtney will be signing tonight at the Boulder Barnes & Noble from 6-8pm, as part of a bookfair fundraiser for the Pikes Peak Writers.  If you’re in the area, come on by!

    Read More...
  • First of all, a hearty round of applause to Teresa Frohock on her debut novel, Miserere: An Autumn Tale! I love the premise of this novel, and I can’t wait for my to read pile to shrink a bit so I can sink my teeth into it. As a reminder, Teresa is holding a giveaway for a signed copy of her book. Just comment on any of the posts this week with the name of a sequel or second book you really enjoyed. For multiple chances, comment on more than one post (but only one chance per post will be counted).

    Ok, on to the subject at hand… I recently published my debut novel, The Winds of Khalakovo. I also recently finished the first draft of the second novel in The Lays of Anuskaya trilogy, so when Aidan brought up the possibility of a guest post, one of the things I immediately thought of was talking a bit about the differences in writing Book 2 vs. Book 1.

    I had been wary of writing the second novel in a series for quite some time. That sounds strange, even to my ear, but it’s true. I didn’t used to think this way. When I first starting writing seriously, ten years ago or so, I thought a sequel would be a natural extension of the first book, and in many ways that’s true, but as I grew in my craft and began to go to conventions and get advice about writing a sequel, I grew … not worried, but certainly concerned.

    Why? Well, there are a few things going on here.

    (more…)

    Read More...